Non-intensive care unit feasibility for ambulatory veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients

IntroductionVeno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation has increasingly been utilized to support patients in respiratory failure as a bridge to recovery or lung transplantation. As patients progress from cannulation to recovery or transplantation, it has been shown that physical therapy and ambulation are possible and beneficial for patient outcomes.MethodsWe sought to evaluate the feasibility of managing these ambulatory VV-ECMO patients in a non-ICU setting by conducting a single-center, retrospective cohort study to characterize the daily data collection (i.e., CXRs, blood draws, etc.) and ICU and ECMO interventions and events (i.e., oxygenator/cannula exchange, sweep or flow adjustments, etc.).ResultsA total of 28 ECMO runs from patients ≥18 years of age who ambulated ≥100 feet while on VV ECMO between 2014 and 2020 were included for analysis. Patients were supported on ECMO a median of 33 [18-79.5] days with a mean of 4.0 (3.8,4.1) data collections per day. There was a mean of 1.1 (1.0,1.2) anticoagulation changes, 1.5 (1.4,1.6) ECMO interventions, and 0.40 (0.34,0.46) ICU interventions per day. There were very few instances of cannula repositioning or oxygenator exchanges - 0.05 (CI 0.04, 0.06) per day.ConclusionOur data suggests that ambulatory VV-ECMO patients may tolerate less than ICU level of care and may even progress to outpatient management as ECMO technology continues to advance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Perfusion
Published
2024-11-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02676591241302959
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Non-intensive care unit feasibility for ambulatory veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients

Warren Naselsky, Zhongjun J. Wu, Aakash M. Shah, Leena Ramadan et al.
1 links
Perfusion
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

Non-intensive care unit feasibility for ambulatory veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients

Warren Naselsky, Zhongjun J. Wu, Aakash M. Shah, Leena Ramadan, Alison Grazioli, Joshua L. Leibowitz, Bartley P. Griffith, Stephen Stachnik, Joseph Rabin, Shreya Singireddy, Jason Ejimogu
article en

Abstract

IntroductionVeno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation has increasingly been utilized to support patients in respiratory failure as a bridge to recovery or lung transplantation. As patients progress from cannulation to recovery or transplantation, it has been shown that physical therapy and ambulation are possible and beneficial for patient outcomes.MethodsWe sought to evaluate the feasibility of managing these ambulatory VV-ECMO patients in a non-ICU setting by conducting a single-center, retrospective cohort study to characterize the daily data collection (i.e., CXRs, blood draws, etc.) and ICU and ECMO interventions and events (i.e., oxygenator/cannula exchange, sweep or flow adjustments, etc.).ResultsA total of 28 ECMO runs from patients ≥18 years of age who ambulated ≥100 feet while on VV ECMO between 2014 and 2020 were included for analysis. Patients were supported on ECMO a median of 33 [18-79.5] days with a mean of 4.0 (3.8,4.1) data collections per day. There was a mean of 1.1 (1.0,1.2) anticoagulation changes, 1.5 (1.4,1.6) ECMO interventions, and 0.40 (0.34,0.46) ICU interventions per day. There were very few instances of cannula repositioning or oxygenator exchanges - 0.05 (CI 0.04, 0.06) per day.ConclusionOur data suggests that ambulatory VV-ECMO patients may tolerate less than ICU level of care and may even progress to outpatient management as ECMO technology continues to advance.

PerfusionVol. 40(6)
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.