Mind your Ps and Qs – Caveats in metabolomics data analysis

Metabolomics studies use high-throughput analytical platforms to measure metabolites in biological samples. These mass spectrometry and/or NMR spectroscopy platforms generate complex data sets, and the analysis of such data poses many challenges, in particular the high dimensionality with relatively fewer number of samples means that sophisticated statistical models are required to analyse these data and these models come with caveats. In this review, we discuss some of these common caveats associated with most popular statistical tests and models. We present common mistakes found in metabolomics data analysis, along with recommendations on how to avoid them. The aim of this review is to raise awareness of the potential risks of misusing or abusing statistical models, and to promote good practices for reliable and reproducible metabolomics research. A new form of permutation test with emphasis on assessing the statistical significance level of the effect captured by supervised model is also proposed. • Inappropriate use of statistics is one of main cause of irreproducible scientific studies. • Common mistakes found in metabolomics studies are reviewed. • Recommendations of the proper use of common statistical tools are made. • A form of permutation test is presented. • Mind your Ps and Qs is an English idiom that means to be on your best behaviour. This is apt for metabolomics data analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry
Published
2024-11-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2024.118064
Citations
15
Primary Topic
Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.51

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mind your Ps and Qs – Caveats in metabolomics data analysis

Royston Goodacre, Yun Xu
15 citations
TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry
Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
3.51
article

Mind your Ps and Qs – Caveats in metabolomics data analysis

Royston Goodacre, Yun Xu
article en
15 citations

Abstract

Metabolomics studies use high-throughput analytical platforms to measure metabolites in biological samples. These mass spectrometry and/or NMR spectroscopy platforms generate complex data sets, and the analysis of such data poses many challenges, in particular the high dimensionality with relatively fewer number of samples means that sophisticated statistical models are required to analyse these data and these models come with caveats. In this review, we discuss some of these common caveats associated with most popular statistical tests and models. We present common mistakes found in metabolomics data analysis, along with recommendations on how to avoid them. The aim of this review is to raise awareness of the potential risks of misusing or abusing statistical models, and to promote good practices for reliable and reproducible metabolomics research. A new form of permutation test with emphasis on assessing the statistical significance level of the effect captured by supervised model is also proposed. • Inappropriate use of statistics is one of main cause of irreproducible scientific studies. • Common mistakes found in metabolomics studies are reviewed. • Recommendations of the proper use of common statistical tools are made. • A form of permutation test is presented. • Mind your Ps and Qs is an English idiom that means to be on your best behaviour. This is apt for metabolomics data analysis.

TrAC Trends in Analytical ChemistryVol. 183
University of Liverpool (GB)
Medical Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
3.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.