Proceedings of the Second Symposium of the Dionysius Circle: <i>“Participationes tripliciter considerari possunt”</i>: The Absolute Notion of <i>Esse</i> in Aquinas’s Commentary on the <i>Divine Names</i>

Abstract In this paper, I argue that, for Aquinas, esse commune is the absolute notion of esse . It is absolute, moreover, precisely in the Avicennian sense insofar as it is the consideration of esse as abstracted from intelligible and material modes of being. First, I clarify Dionysius’s distinction between the two senses of per se theonyms, focusing on the Procline provenance of adverbs like ἀπολύτως and ἀρχηγικῶς in the Divine Names . Second, I defend Aquinas’s interpretation and development of Dionysius’s distinction, higlighting his reliance on Avicenna’s threefold consideratio in his account of per se theonyms as absolute natures. I will conclude with suggestions for further research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal for the Study of Thomas Aquinas
Published
2024-11-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/ejsta-2024-0007
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Medieval and Classical Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.22
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Proceedings of the Second Symposium of the Dionysius Circle: “Participationes tripliciter considerari possunt”: The Absolute Notion of Esse in Aquinas’s Commentary on the Divine Names

C. Stark
1 citations
European Journal for the Study of Thomas Aquinas
Medieval and Classical Philosophy
4.22
article

Proceedings of the Second Symposium of the Dionysius Circle: “Participationes tripliciter considerari possunt”: The Absolute Notion of Esse in Aquinas’s Commentary on the Divine Names

C. Stark
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, I argue that, for Aquinas, esse commune is the absolute notion of esse . It is absolute, moreover, precisely in the Avicennian sense insofar as it is the consideration of esse as abstracted from intelligible and material modes of being. First, I clarify Dionysius’s distinction between the two senses of per se theonyms, focusing on the Procline provenance of adverbs like ἀπολύτως and ἀρχηγικῶς in the Divine Names . Second, I defend Aquinas’s interpretation and development of Dionysius’s distinction, higlighting his reliance on Avicenna’s threefold consideratio in his account of per se theonyms as absolute natures. I will conclude with suggestions for further research.

European Journal for the Study of Thomas AquinasVol. 42(1)
Catholic University of America (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Medieval and Classical Philosophy
4.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.