Freud’s animality

The animal nature of human beings has all but disappeared from psychoanalytic discourse. This reflects Freud's struggle with the issue of animality, which he at once repudiates, and simultaneously conceals at the core of human mental life. Freud's use of the terms "animal" and "man" constantly shifts as he attempts to employ them in key areas of analytic theory building, while also shifting his perspective along the way to consider the opposition, similarity and identity of these terms. This impedes attempts to find structure and coherence in Freud's view, which is almost liquid in its instability. For Freud what separates man from the animal world does not rely upon the evolutionary or anthropological arguments he makes, but on a process of identification and disidentification that consigns animality to "not-me" states in support of Oedipal resolution. Ultimately, his attempts to bind and tame human animality via Oedipality cannot contain that which was never separate and could never be separated from the human.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Psychoanalysis
Published
2024-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00207578.2024.2395742
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.22
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Freud’s animality

Bruce Reis
1 citations
The International Journal of Psychoanalysis
Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
4.22
article

Freud’s animality

Bruce Reis
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The animal nature of human beings has all but disappeared from psychoanalytic discourse. This reflects Freud's struggle with the issue of animality, which he at once repudiates, and simultaneously conceals at the core of human mental life. Freud's use of the terms "animal" and "man" constantly shifts as he attempts to employ them in key areas of analytic theory building, while also shifting his perspective along the way to consider the opposition, similarity and identity of these terms. This impedes attempts to find structure and coherence in Freud's view, which is almost liquid in its instability. For Freud what separates man from the animal world does not rely upon the evolutionary or anthropological arguments he makes, but on a process of identification and disidentification that consigns animality to "not-me" states in support of Oedipal resolution. Ultimately, his attempts to bind and tame human animality via Oedipality cannot contain that which was never separate and could never be separated from the human.

The International Journal of PsychoanalysisVol. 105(5)
International Psychoanalytical Association (GB), International Association for Psychoanalytic Self Psychology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
4.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Freud’s animality — Bruce Reis · The International Journal of Psychoanalysis (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS