Evaluation of shear strength and durability of adhesive bond in cross-laminated timber (CLT) panels made from Nigerian Gmelina arborea timber

This study investigates the shear strength and durability of wood-adhesive bonds in Cross-Laminated Timber (CLT) panels made from Nigerian grown Gmelina arborea using one-component Polyurethane (PUR) and two-component Epoxy Resin (ER) adhesives. The block shear test and delamination test, conducted in accordance with EN 14080 (2015) and EN 16351 (2015), were employed to assess the bond quality and durability. The maximum shear strengths observed were 3.37 MPa for PUR and 2.78 MPa for ER, with respective minimum values of 2.88 MPa and 2.45 MPa. Wood failure percentage (WFP) analysis indicated that ER exhibited slightly better adhesive performance under dry conditions, while PUR demonstrated superior performance after delamination. A moderate positive correlation (r ≈ 0.579) was found between shear strength and WFP for PUR, whereas ER showed a very weak correlation (r ≈ 0.015), suggesting differing performance characteristics between the adhesives. The delamination test results showed PUR generally outperformed ER, particularly in smaller CLT-60 panels, indicating better bond durability. A strong positive correlation (r ≈ 0.984) between total delamination (D tot ) and maximum delamination (D max ) was identified, while no significant correlation was found between delamination and WFP. The findings suggest that while PUR offers higher shear strength and better durability, ER provides more consistent adhesive performance. Panel size was also found to influence the bonding performance, with smaller panels exhibiting lower delamination percentages. Overall, PUR appears more suitable for applications requiring high durability, particularly in smaller panels, while ER might be preferable for larger panels where consistent bond quality is critical. • The maximum shear strengths observed were 3.37 MPa for PUR and 2.78 MPa for ER. • WFP analysis indicated that ER exhibited slightly better adhesive performance. • The delamination test results showed PUR generally outperformed ER, indicating better bond durability. • The findings suggest that while PUR offers higher shear strength, ER provides more consistent adhesive performance. • Overall, PUR appears more suitable for applications requiring high durability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Case Studies in Construction Materials
Published
2024-11-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e04026
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Wood Treatment and Properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.80

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of shear strength and durability of adhesive bond in cross-laminated timber (CLT) panels made from Nigerian Gmelina arborea timber

Tasiu Ashiru Sulaiman, Yusuf Yau, Adamu Lawan, Jibrin Mohammed Kaura et al.
3 citations
Case Studies in Construction Materials
Wood Treatment and Properties
0.80
article

Evaluation of shear strength and durability of adhesive bond in cross-laminated timber (CLT) panels made from Nigerian Gmelina arborea timber

Tasiu Ashiru Sulaiman, Yusuf Yau, Adamu Lawan, Jibrin Mohammed Kaura, Amana Ocholi
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the shear strength and durability of wood-adhesive bonds in Cross-Laminated Timber (CLT) panels made from Nigerian grown Gmelina arborea using one-component Polyurethane (PUR) and two-component Epoxy Resin (ER) adhesives. The block shear test and delamination test, conducted in accordance with EN 14080 (2015) and EN 16351 (2015), were employed to assess the bond quality and durability. The maximum shear strengths observed were 3.37 MPa for PUR and 2.78 MPa for ER, with respective minimum values of 2.88 MPa and 2.45 MPa. Wood failure percentage (WFP) analysis indicated that ER exhibited slightly better adhesive performance under dry conditions, while PUR demonstrated superior performance after delamination. A moderate positive correlation (r ≈ 0.579) was found between shear strength and WFP for PUR, whereas ER showed a very weak correlation (r ≈ 0.015), suggesting differing performance characteristics between the adhesives. The delamination test results showed PUR generally outperformed ER, particularly in smaller CLT-60 panels, indicating better bond durability. A strong positive correlation (r ≈ 0.984) between total delamination (D tot ) and maximum delamination (D max ) was identified, while no significant correlation was found between delamination and WFP. The findings suggest that while PUR offers higher shear strength and better durability, ER provides more consistent adhesive performance. Panel size was also found to influence the bonding performance, with smaller panels exhibiting lower delamination percentages. Overall, PUR appears more suitable for applications requiring high durability, particularly in smaller panels, while ER might be preferable for larger panels where consistent bond quality is critical. • The maximum shear strengths observed were 3.37 MPa for PUR and 2.78 MPa for ER. • WFP analysis indicated that ER exhibited slightly better adhesive performance. • The delamination test results showed PUR generally outperformed ER, indicating better bond durability. • The findings suggest that while PUR offers higher shear strength, ER provides more consistent adhesive performance. • Overall, PUR appears more suitable for applications requiring high durability.

Case Studies in Construction MaterialsVol. 21
Ahmadu Bello University (NG)
Petroleum Technology Development Fund
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Wood Treatment and Properties
0.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.