Philosophy and the Language of the People: The Claims of Common Speech from Petrarch to Locke, by Lodi Nauta

Although the history of linguistic thought is a well-established field of research, it still suffers from a relative isolation from the mainstream of historicalphilosophical studies, as though it were more of interest to linguists than to philosophers. This is especially the case when the period under scrutiny is the Renaissance and early modern age, and the subject matter is ordinary language. Debates about language in general and artificial languages in particular tend to attract the interest of philosophers more easily than debates about natural languages or even “the language of the people.” Lodi Nauta’s book is an attempt to overturn this prejudice by documenting the philosophical import of Renaissance and early modern views of common language and showing that the humanist opposition to scholastic jargon played a significant role in the complex transition from the Middle Ages to modernity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vivarium
Published
2024-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/15685349-06204006
Primary Topic
Medieval and Classical Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Philosophy and the Language of the People: The Claims of Common Speech from Petrarch to Locke, by Lodi Nauta

Matteo Favaretti Camposampiero
Vivarium
Medieval and Classical Philosophy
article

Philosophy and the Language of the People: The Claims of Common Speech from Petrarch to Locke, by Lodi Nauta

Matteo Favaretti Camposampiero
article en

Abstract

Although the history of linguistic thought is a well-established field of research, it still suffers from a relative isolation from the mainstream of historicalphilosophical studies, as though it were more of interest to linguists than to philosophers. This is especially the case when the period under scrutiny is the Renaissance and early modern age, and the subject matter is ordinary language. Debates about language in general and artificial languages in particular tend to attract the interest of philosophers more easily than debates about natural languages or even “the language of the people.” Lodi Nauta’s book is an attempt to overturn this prejudice by documenting the philosophical import of Renaissance and early modern views of common language and showing that the humanist opposition to scholastic jargon played a significant role in the complex transition from the Middle Ages to modernity.

VivariumVol. 62(4)
Ca' Foscari University of Venice (IT)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Medieval and Classical Philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.