A universal scaling for the length scales of shock-induced separation

Experiments of transitional shock wave–boundary layer interactions (SBLIs) over 6 $^\circ$ and 10 $^\circ$ compression ramps were performed at Mach number 1.65. The unit Reynolds number was varied by a factor of two between 5.6 million per metre and 11 million per metre. Schlieren flow visualization was performed, and mean flow measurements were made using Pitot probes. Free interaction theory was verified from pressure measurements for all operating conditions. A new non-dimensional parameter was developed for scaling the strength of the imposed shock, which was based on the pressure required to separate a boundary layer. The validity of this new scaling was supported by the reconciliation of large discrepancies in a diverse collection of experimental results on the length scales of transitional interactions. This non-dimensional scaling was also applied to turbulent interactions, where different models were used to determine the pressure required to separate a turbulent boundary layer. Finally, a direct comparison between transitional and turbulent SBLIs was made, which revealed new insights into the evolution of length scales based on the state of the boundary layer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Fluid Mechanics
Published
2024-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2024.864
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.87

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A universal scaling for the length scales of shock-induced separation

Pierre Dupont, Nikhil Mahalingesh, Sébastien Piponniau
5 citations
Journal of Fluid Mechanics
Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
1.87
article

A universal scaling for the length scales of shock-induced separation

Pierre Dupont, Nikhil Mahalingesh, Sébastien Piponniau
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Experiments of transitional shock wave–boundary layer interactions (SBLIs) over 6 $^\circ$ and 10 $^\circ$ compression ramps were performed at Mach number 1.65. The unit Reynolds number was varied by a factor of two between 5.6 million per metre and 11 million per metre. Schlieren flow visualization was performed, and mean flow measurements were made using Pitot probes. Free interaction theory was verified from pressure measurements for all operating conditions. A new non-dimensional parameter was developed for scaling the strength of the imposed shock, which was based on the pressure required to separate a boundary layer. The validity of this new scaling was supported by the reconciliation of large discrepancies in a diverse collection of experimental results on the length scales of transitional interactions. This non-dimensional scaling was also applied to turbulent interactions, where different models were used to determine the pressure required to separate a turbulent boundary layer. Finally, a direct comparison between transitional and turbulent SBLIs was made, which revealed new insights into the evolution of length scales based on the state of the boundary layer.

Journal of Fluid MechanicsVol. 1000
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Aix-Marseille Université (FR), Institut Universitaire des Systèmes Thermiques Industriels (FR)
European Commission, H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
1.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A universal scaling for the length scales of shock-induced separation — Pierre Dupont, Nikhil Mahalingesh, et al. · Journal of Fluid Mechanics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS