Comparative Analysis of Conventional Object Detection Models on Fisheye Images

Fisheye cameras are increasingly used for object detection and tracking across various sectors. However, fish-eye images present distortions that complicate their processing compared to flat images. Two main approaches exist to tackle this challenge: calibrating fisheye images to convert them into flat images before applying traditional image processing models, or directly employing these models on fisheye images. In this study, we investigated both approaches using two fisheye image databases. Our findings indicate that calibration results in information loss and inadequate time savings. Furthermore, traditional models, despite optimization efforts, exhibit limited performance of approximately 20%, emphasizing the necessity for developing specific algorithms tailored to this technology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ipta62886.2024.10755599
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Conventional Object Detection Models on Fisheye Images

Bouzayane Sarra, Aberkane Arezki, Moumouh Houssam, Sekkiou Imene
1 citations
Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
0.20
article

Comparative Analysis of Conventional Object Detection Models on Fisheye Images

Bouzayane Sarra, Aberkane Arezki, Moumouh Houssam, Sekkiou Imene
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Fisheye cameras are increasingly used for object detection and tracking across various sectors. However, fish-eye images present distortions that complicate their processing compared to flat images. Two main approaches exist to tackle this challenge: calibrating fisheye images to convert them into flat images before applying traditional image processing models, or directly employing these models on fisheye images. In this study, we investigated both approaches using two fisheye image databases. Our findings indicate that calibration results in information loss and inadequate time savings. Furthermore, traditional models, despite optimization efforts, exhibit limited performance of approximately 20%, emphasizing the necessity for developing specific algorithms tailored to this technology.

Eiffage (France) (FR)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
0.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.