Energy knowledge and public response to restarting nuclear plants in Japan following the fukushima accident

Since the Fukushima accident, Japan's nuclear policy has changed dramatically. However, restarting operations of some reactors has become an option for the government. This study focuses on the role of objective knowledge and, for the first time, develops statements for measuring people's accurate factual judgments and reflecting on energy issues in post-Fukushima Japan. Replies of two surveys conducted in the Kansai region were analyzed. From them, it was observed that having objective knowledge was positively associated with holding a favorable opinion rather than an ambiguous opinion toward restarting the plants, and association differences existed between subjective and objective knowledge. •Japanese nuclear operators facing public's concerns for plant restart. •Necessary to measure objective knowledge reflecting post-Fukushima Japan. •Two surveys conducted for examining objective knowledge roles. •Objective knowledge positively associates with favorable opinion.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Utilities Policy
Published
2024-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2024.101858
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Risk Perception and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Energy knowledge and public response to restarting nuclear plants in Japan following the fukushima accident

Tomohiro Fujita
1 citations
Utilities Policy
Risk Perception and Management
1.13
article

Energy knowledge and public response to restarting nuclear plants in Japan following the fukushima accident

Tomohiro Fujita
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Since the Fukushima accident, Japan's nuclear policy has changed dramatically. However, restarting operations of some reactors has become an option for the government. This study focuses on the role of objective knowledge and, for the first time, develops statements for measuring people's accurate factual judgments and reflecting on energy issues in post-Fukushima Japan. Replies of two surveys conducted in the Kansai region were analyzed. From them, it was observed that having objective knowledge was positively associated with holding a favorable opinion rather than an ambiguous opinion toward restarting the plants, and association differences existed between subjective and objective knowledge. •Japanese nuclear operators facing public's concerns for plant restart. •Necessary to measure objective knowledge reflecting post-Fukushima Japan. •Two surveys conducted for examining objective knowledge roles. •Objective knowledge positively associates with favorable opinion.

Utilities PolicyVol. 92
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Risk Perception and Management
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.