Cycle Syncing and TikTok’s Digital Landscape: A Reasoned Action Elicitation Through a Critical Feminist Lens

Cycle syncing is a menstrual health trend on TikTok that involves aligning exercise and diet with the four menstrual cycle phases. Cycle syncing is part of the conversation on social media about women's reproductive health. However, clinical research on the effects of cycle syncing is inconclusive, and there is the potential that this trend could further perpetuate misinformation and gender stereotypes. Research suggests that social media can affect health behaviors, highlighting the need to understand if women intend to participate in cycle syncing. Guided by the Reasoned Action Approach, this study used focus groups (<i>n</i> = 39) to examine young women's attitudes, normative beliefs, and control beliefs about participating in cycle syncing, and critical feminist theory to sensitize resulting themes. Results suggest that normative beliefs emphasize support for the behavior among women, yet participants suggest that men would not support this behavior. Additionally, positive beliefs about cycle syncing content sourced from inconclusive scientific literature underscores concerns regarding the potential dissemination of misinformation in women's health practices on social media. Findings also fit into a larger discussion about "hormonophobia" and contraception on social media. Theoretical implications for mixed methods research and future directions are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Qualitative Health Research
Published
2024-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323241297683
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Behavioral Health and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cycle Syncing and TikTok’s Digital Landscape: A Reasoned Action Elicitation Through a Critical Feminist Lens

Emily J. Pfender, Amy Bleakley, Claire V. Wanzer, Katelynn L. Kuijpers
2 citations
Qualitative Health Research
Behavioral Health and Interventions
0.82
article

Cycle Syncing and TikTok’s Digital Landscape: A Reasoned Action Elicitation Through a Critical Feminist Lens

Emily J. Pfender, Amy Bleakley, Claire V. Wanzer, Katelynn L. Kuijpers
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Cycle syncing is a menstrual health trend on TikTok that involves aligning exercise and diet with the four menstrual cycle phases. Cycle syncing is part of the conversation on social media about women's reproductive health. However, clinical research on the effects of cycle syncing is inconclusive, and there is the potential that this trend could further perpetuate misinformation and gender stereotypes. Research suggests that social media can affect health behaviors, highlighting the need to understand if women intend to participate in cycle syncing. Guided by the Reasoned Action Approach, this study used focus groups (<i>n</i> = 39) to examine young women's attitudes, normative beliefs, and control beliefs about participating in cycle syncing, and critical feminist theory to sensitize resulting themes. Results suggest that normative beliefs emphasize support for the behavior among women, yet participants suggest that men would not support this behavior. Additionally, positive beliefs about cycle syncing content sourced from inconclusive scientific literature underscores concerns regarding the potential dissemination of misinformation in women's health practices on social media. Findings also fit into a larger discussion about "hormonophobia" and contraception on social media. Theoretical implications for mixed methods research and future directions are discussed.

Qualitative Health ResearchVol. 35(10-11)
California University of Pennsylvania (US), University of Pennsylvania (US), University of Delaware (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Behavioral Health and Interventions
0.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.