Physics and Data Collaborative Root Cause Analysis

Data-driven tools for asset health management face significant challenges, including a lack of understanding of physical principles, difficulty incorporating domain experts’ experiences, and consequently low detection accuracy, leading to trustworthiness issues. Automatically integrating data-driven analysis with human knowledge and experience, as found in literature and maintenance logs, is critically needed. Recent progress in large language models (LLMs) offers opportunities to achieve this goal. However, there is still a lack of work that effectively combines pretrained LLMs with data-driven models for asset health management using industrial time series data as input. This paper presents a framework that integrates our recently proposed data-driven AI with pretrained LLMs to address root cause detection in industrial failure analysis. The framework employs LLMs to analyze outputs from our data-driven root cause analysis models, filtering out less relevant results and prioritizing those that align closely with physical principles and domain expertise. Our innovative approach leverages advanced data-driven analytics and a multi-LLM debate for collaborative decision-making, seamlessly merging data-driven insights with domain knowledge. Specifically, through our proposed self-exclusionary debates among multiple LLMs, biases inherent in single-LLM systems are effectively mitigated, enhancing reliability and stability. Crucially, the framework bridges the gap between data-driven models and physics-informed LLMs, accelerating the interaction between data and knowledge for more informed and realistic decision-making processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annual Conference of the PHM Society
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36001/phmconf.2024.v16i1.3881
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physics and Data Collaborative Root Cause Analysis

Tapan Shah, John Karigiannis, Scott Evans, Hao Huang
2 citations
Annual Conference of the PHM Society
Occupational Health and Safety Research
1.54
article

Physics and Data Collaborative Root Cause Analysis

Tapan Shah, John Karigiannis, Scott Evans, Hao Huang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Data-driven tools for asset health management face significant challenges, including a lack of understanding of physical principles, difficulty incorporating domain experts’ experiences, and consequently low detection accuracy, leading to trustworthiness issues. Automatically integrating data-driven analysis with human knowledge and experience, as found in literature and maintenance logs, is critically needed. Recent progress in large language models (LLMs) offers opportunities to achieve this goal. However, there is still a lack of work that effectively combines pretrained LLMs with data-driven models for asset health management using industrial time series data as input. This paper presents a framework that integrates our recently proposed data-driven AI with pretrained LLMs to address root cause detection in industrial failure analysis. The framework employs LLMs to analyze outputs from our data-driven root cause analysis models, filtering out less relevant results and prioritizing those that align closely with physical principles and domain expertise. Our innovative approach leverages advanced data-driven analytics and a multi-LLM debate for collaborative decision-making, seamlessly merging data-driven insights with domain knowledge. Specifically, through our proposed self-exclusionary debates among multiple LLMs, biases inherent in single-LLM systems are effectively mitigated, enhancing reliability and stability. Crucially, the framework bridges the gap between data-driven models and physics-informed LLMs, accelerating the interaction between data and knowledge for more informed and realistic decision-making processes.

Annual Conference of the PHM SocietyVol. 16(1)
GE Global Research (United States) (US), GE Vernova (United States)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
1.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.