Geomorphological signatures of known hurricanes and validation of theoretical emplacement formulations: Coastal boulder deposits on Cuban low-lying marine terraces

Coastal boulder deposits, observed worldwide, provide geomorphological evidence of extreme wave events such as storms, hurricanes and tsunamis. Theoretical formulations have been developed for determining hydrodynamic conditions responsible for boulder emplacement on the shore, which increasingly make use of boulder geometry and associated site geomorphology. Nevertheless, information on extreme events responsible for the emplacement of coastal boulders is rarely available, meaning there has been limited opportunity to test existing formulations in the light of real hydrodynamic and geomorphic data. In this study, we take advantage of the important record of coastal boulder deposits on Cuba Island to compare the hydrodynamic parameters (minimum flow velocity) deduced from the boulders' morphology and emplacement characteristics, with hydrodynamic conditions (maximum wave height and orbital velocity) that occurred during the tropical cyclones responsible for the boulders' actual emplacement. We selected four sites where three hurricanes have emplaced five boulders on low-lying coral reef terraces over the last 50 years. Using terrestrial Structure-from-Motion photogrammetry, we determined with precision the boulders' shape and volume, which in combination with density, mode of emplacement and distance from the shore, were used to calculate the minimum flow velocity responsible for dislocation of the coral reef terrace and inland transport. To serve as comparisons, available modelled data of wave height and period were used to estimate the maximum orbital velocity that possibly occurred during the weather event using linear wave theory. Our results show that for all boulders studied except one, there is a good agreement between the values of minimum flow and maximal orbital velocities, with minimum flow velocities for boulder emplacement consistently smaller than the maximum wave orbital velocity during the weather event. The difference observed for one boulder is attributed to specific site effects, highlighting in this case the limitation of using distant hydrometeorological data for characterizing wave processes responsible for coastal boulder deposits. Helped by detailed data collected on boulders with large differences in morphology including size, and mode of emplacement, this study confirms the pertinence of using formulations relating boulder morphology and site characteristics to the minimum flow velocity that detached and transported the boulder. It further emphasizes the importance of obtaining adequate boulder and geomorphic setting characterizations to link geomorphological proxies and extreme wave events. • Description of five cuban coastal boulders associated with historical hurricanes. • Comparison of boulder-derived flow velocities with actual wave data from cyclones. • Accurate boulder volume is crucial for linking geomorphological proxies to wave events. • Specific site effects highlight the caution of using distant hydrometeorological data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Marine Geology
Published
2024-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2024.107438
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Coastal and Marine Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geomorphological signatures of known hurricanes and validation of theoretical emplacement formulations: Coastal boulder deposits on Cuban low-lying marine terraces

France Floc’h, Patricio Winckler, Marion Jaud, Kévin Pedoja et al.
6 citations
Marine Geology
Coastal and Marine Dynamics
3.09
article

Geomorphological signatures of known hurricanes and validation of theoretical emplacement formulations: Coastal boulder deposits on Cuban low-lying marine terraces

France Floc’h, Patricio Winckler, Marion Jaud, Kévin Pedoja, Denovan Chauveau, Julius Jara–Muñoz, Pedro Luis Dunán Avila, Pauline Letortu, Arelis Nuñez‐Labañino, Christine Authémayou, Stéphane Bertin, Ángel Raúl Rodríguez‐Valdés, Jean Pierre-Toledo, Pedro de Jesus Benítez-Frometa, Hassan Ross-Cabrera, Noel Coutín-Lobaina, Leandro Peñalver-Hernández
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Coastal boulder deposits, observed worldwide, provide geomorphological evidence of extreme wave events such as storms, hurricanes and tsunamis. Theoretical formulations have been developed for determining hydrodynamic conditions responsible for boulder emplacement on the shore, which increasingly make use of boulder geometry and associated site geomorphology. Nevertheless, information on extreme events responsible for the emplacement of coastal boulders is rarely available, meaning there has been limited opportunity to test existing formulations in the light of real hydrodynamic and geomorphic data. In this study, we take advantage of the important record of coastal boulder deposits on Cuba Island to compare the hydrodynamic parameters (minimum flow velocity) deduced from the boulders' morphology and emplacement characteristics, with hydrodynamic conditions (maximum wave height and orbital velocity) that occurred during the tropical cyclones responsible for the boulders' actual emplacement. We selected four sites where three hurricanes have emplaced five boulders on low-lying coral reef terraces over the last 50 years. Using terrestrial Structure-from-Motion photogrammetry, we determined with precision the boulders' shape and volume, which in combination with density, mode of emplacement and distance from the shore, were used to calculate the minimum flow velocity responsible for dislocation of the coral reef terrace and inland transport. To serve as comparisons, available modelled data of wave height and period were used to estimate the maximum orbital velocity that possibly occurred during the weather event using linear wave theory. Our results show that for all boulders studied except one, there is a good agreement between the values of minimum flow and maximal orbital velocities, with minimum flow velocities for boulder emplacement consistently smaller than the maximum wave orbital velocity during the weather event. The difference observed for one boulder is attributed to specific site effects, highlighting in this case the limitation of using distant hydrometeorological data for characterizing wave processes responsible for coastal boulder deposits. Helped by detailed data collected on boulders with large differences in morphology including size, and mode of emplacement, this study confirms the pertinence of using formulations relating boulder morphology and site characteristics to the minimum flow velocity that detached and transported the boulder. It further emphasizes the importance of obtaining adequate boulder and geomorphic setting characterizations to link geomorphological proxies and extreme wave events. • Description of five cuban coastal boulders associated with historical hurricanes. • Comparison of boulder-derived flow velocities with actual wave data from cyclones. • Accurate boulder volume is crucial for linking geomorphological proxies to wave events. • Specific site effects highlight the caution of using distant hydrometeorological data.

Marine GeologyVol. 480
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso (CL), Ifremer (FR), Université de Bretagne Occidentale (FR), École nationale d'ingénieurs de Brest (FR), University of Applied Sciences Biberach (DE), Continental (France) (FR), Instituto de Gastroenterología (CU), Universidad de Guantánamo (CU), Institut Universitaire Européen de la Mer (FR), University of Sancti Spíritus José Martí Pérez (CU), Laboratoire des Sciences de l'Environnement Marin (FR), Research Center for Integrated Disaster Risk Management (CL), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR), Littoral, Environnement, Télédétection, Géomatique (FR), University of Valparaíso (CL)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Coastal and Marine Dynamics
3.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.