A comparison of linear and nonlinear 3D semi-Lagrangian motion of moored Waverider and Spotter wave buoys

Wave records from oceanographic buoys remain indispensable in coastal and offshore engineering. Modern wave buoys produce semi-Lagrangian time histories of motions in three dimensions (one vertical and two horizontal) in addition to the standard statistical output. Datawell Directional Waverider (DWR) buoys have long been recognized as providing high quality measurements, while other types of wave buoys have been introduced more recently. This study analyses field data measured by two types of wave buoys: one DWR4 and three Sofar Spotter buoys, all moored on intermediate water depth offshore Western Australia. The time histories recorded by the two types of wave buoys in three orthogonal directions and the relationship between them are comprehensively examined on a wave-by-wave basis. Although focusing on mild sea states, the analysis identifies significant second-order motion components in the horizontal plane for both DWR4 and Spotter buoys. It is confirmed that both DWR and Spotters work well and consistently in the vertical direction. However, we present considerable evidence that the DWR4 buoy overestimates the displacements in the horizontal plane by a factor of approximately 1/0.85 times, while the Spotter buoys’ displacements match well with theoretical predictions in the horizontal plane. Despite this apparent calibration error, both the mean wave direction and the directional spreading match well between the two buoy types, with the DWR4 giving slightly lower spreading angles at higher frequency. These observations shed new insights into the wave buoy motions in 3D on intermediate water depth. • Measured data from DWR4 and Sofar Spotter buoys are comprehensively analysed. • Both statistical analysis and wave-by-wave analysis are conducted. • Nonlinear components are clearly identified in these semi-Lagrangian motion data. • It is striking to observe that the DWR4 buoy overestimates horizontal displacements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Coastal Engineering
Published
2024-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2024.104661
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Wave and Wind Energy Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.34

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparison of linear and nonlinear 3D semi-Lagrangian motion of moored Waverider and Spotter wave buoys

Thobani Hlophe, Paul H. Taylor, Wenhua Zhao, Yue Ding
4 citations
Coastal Engineering
Wave and Wind Energy Systems
1.34
article

A comparison of linear and nonlinear 3D semi-Lagrangian motion of moored Waverider and Spotter wave buoys

Thobani Hlophe, Paul H. Taylor, Wenhua Zhao, Yue Ding
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Wave records from oceanographic buoys remain indispensable in coastal and offshore engineering. Modern wave buoys produce semi-Lagrangian time histories of motions in three dimensions (one vertical and two horizontal) in addition to the standard statistical output. Datawell Directional Waverider (DWR) buoys have long been recognized as providing high quality measurements, while other types of wave buoys have been introduced more recently. This study analyses field data measured by two types of wave buoys: one DWR4 and three Sofar Spotter buoys, all moored on intermediate water depth offshore Western Australia. The time histories recorded by the two types of wave buoys in three orthogonal directions and the relationship between them are comprehensively examined on a wave-by-wave basis. Although focusing on mild sea states, the analysis identifies significant second-order motion components in the horizontal plane for both DWR4 and Spotter buoys. It is confirmed that both DWR and Spotters work well and consistently in the vertical direction. However, we present considerable evidence that the DWR4 buoy overestimates the displacements in the horizontal plane by a factor of approximately 1/0.85 times, while the Spotter buoys’ displacements match well with theoretical predictions in the horizontal plane. Despite this apparent calibration error, both the mean wave direction and the directional spreading match well between the two buoy types, with the DWR4 giving slightly lower spreading angles at higher frequency. These observations shed new insights into the wave buoy motions in 3D on intermediate water depth. • Measured data from DWR4 and Sofar Spotter buoys are comprehensively analysed. • Both statistical analysis and wave-by-wave analysis are conducted. • Nonlinear components are clearly identified in these semi-Lagrangian motion data. • It is striking to observe that the DWR4 buoy overestimates horizontal displacements.

Coastal EngineeringVol. 196
The University of Queensland (AU), The University of Western Australia (AU), University of Oxford (GB)
Australian Research Council
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Wave and Wind Energy Systems
1.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.