Dual-route administration of balanced anesthesia using medetomidine, midazolam, and butorphanol provides both suitable anesthetic depth and reduced tissue injury in rabbits

Medetomidine, midazolam, and butorphanol (MMB) anesthesia is the preferred choice for rodents but requires excess volume of intramuscular injection in rabbits, which can lead to muscular damage. This study aimed to evaluate a dual-route MMB administration via the intravenous and subcutaneous routes in rabbits. MMB was administered to male Kbs:JW rabbits with an intravenous injection of 0.2 ml/kg followed by a subcutaneous injection of 0.8 ml/kg, totaling 0.2 mg/kg medetomidine, 2.0 mg/kg midazolam, and 2.0 mg/kg butorphanol. We compared the anesthetic effects of this dual-route method with those of intramuscular administration. The dual-route method resulted in a shorter induction time and similar anesthetic duration compared with those of the intramuscular route. While it induced a temporary decrease in body temperature within 30 min post-injection, other vital signs, such as respiration rate, heart rate, and O<sub>2</sub> saturation, remained similar. Notably, unlike intramuscular administration, dual-route administration did not increase tissue injury marker levels. This dual-route MMB administration provided sufficient anesthetic depth during surgery, eliminating pain reflexes. Double-dose administration extended anesthetic duration but resulted in rare fatalities, indicating room for protocol improvement. In conclusion, the novel anesthetic method is preferable for injectable anesthesia in rabbits, providing rapid induction and sufficient anesthetic duration, while potentially minimizing muscle injury. This technique may be beneficial for both laboratory and companion animals and significantly enhance animal welfare in anesthesia by reducing the pain associated with injectable anesthesia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS
Published
2024-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1538/expanim.24-0132
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.91

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dual-route administration of balanced anesthesia using medetomidine, midazolam, and butorphanol provides both suitable anesthetic depth and reduced tissue injury in rabbits

Chie Kodama, Kiichiro Matsumura, Jun Tamura, Kensuke Sumi et al.
3 citations
EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS
Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
1.91
article

Dual-route administration of balanced anesthesia using medetomidine, midazolam, and butorphanol provides both suitable anesthetic depth and reduced tissue injury in rabbits

Chie Kodama, Kiichiro Matsumura, Jun Tamura, Kensuke Sumi, Hiroshi Yoshida, Masami Morimatsu, Ko Nakanishi, Teppei Nakamura, Michael Ita, Risa IWANAGA, Mohammad Ibrahim QASIMI
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Medetomidine, midazolam, and butorphanol (MMB) anesthesia is the preferred choice for rodents but requires excess volume of intramuscular injection in rabbits, which can lead to muscular damage. This study aimed to evaluate a dual-route MMB administration via the intravenous and subcutaneous routes in rabbits. MMB was administered to male Kbs:JW rabbits with an intravenous injection of 0.2 ml/kg followed by a subcutaneous injection of 0.8 ml/kg, totaling 0.2 mg/kg medetomidine, 2.0 mg/kg midazolam, and 2.0 mg/kg butorphanol. We compared the anesthetic effects of this dual-route method with those of intramuscular administration. The dual-route method resulted in a shorter induction time and similar anesthetic duration compared with those of the intramuscular route. While it induced a temporary decrease in body temperature within 30 min post-injection, other vital signs, such as respiration rate, heart rate, and O<sub>2</sub> saturation, remained similar. Notably, unlike intramuscular administration, dual-route administration did not increase tissue injury marker levels. This dual-route MMB administration provided sufficient anesthetic depth during surgery, eliminating pain reflexes. Double-dose administration extended anesthetic duration but resulted in rare fatalities, indicating room for protocol improvement. In conclusion, the novel anesthetic method is preferable for injectable anesthesia in rabbits, providing rapid induction and sufficient anesthetic duration, while potentially minimizing muscle injury. This technique may be beneficial for both laboratory and companion animals and significantly enhance animal welfare in anesthesia by reducing the pain associated with injectable anesthesia.

EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALSVol. 74(2)
Hokkaido University (JP), Hokkaido University Hospital (JP), Japan Food Research Laboratories (JP)
Suzuken Memorial Foundation, Hokkaido University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
1.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.