ReXErr: Synthesizing Clinically Meaningful Errors in Diagnostic Radiology Reports

Accurately interpreting medical images and writing radiology reports is a critical but challenging task in healthcare. Both human-written and AI-generated reports can contain errors, ranging from clinical inaccuracies to linguistic mistakes. To address this, we introduce ReXErr, a methodology that leverages Large Language Models to generate representative errors within chest X-ray reports. Working with board-certified radiologists, we developed error categories that capture common mistakes in both human and AI-generated reports. Our approach uses a novel sampling scheme to inject diverse errors while maintaining clinical plausibility. ReXErr demonstrates consistency across error categories and produces errors that closely mimic those found in real-world scenarios. This method has the potential to aid in the development and evaluation of report correction algorithms, potentially enhancing the quality and reliability of radiology reporting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789819807024_0006
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Radiology practices and education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ReXErr: Synthesizing Clinically Meaningful Errors in Diagnostic Radiology Reports

Pranav Rajpurkar, J. Acosta, Subathra Adithan, Vishwanatha M. Rao et al.
1 citations
Radiology practices and education
0.40
article

ReXErr: Synthesizing Clinically Meaningful Errors in Diagnostic Radiology Reports

Pranav Rajpurkar, J. Acosta, Subathra Adithan, Vishwanatha M. Rao, Serena Zhang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Accurately interpreting medical images and writing radiology reports is a critical but challenging task in healthcare. Both human-written and AI-generated reports can contain errors, ranging from clinical inaccuracies to linguistic mistakes. To address this, we introduce ReXErr, a methodology that leverages Large Language Models to generate representative errors within chest X-ray reports. Working with board-certified radiologists, we developed error categories that capture common mistakes in both human and AI-generated reports. Our approach uses a novel sampling scheme to inject diverse errors while maintaining clinical plausibility. ReXErr demonstrates consistency across error categories and produces errors that closely mimic those found in real-world scenarios. This method has the potential to aid in the development and evaluation of report correction algorithms, potentially enhancing the quality and reliability of radiology reporting.

Vol. 30
Harvard University (US), Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Radiology practices and education
0.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

ReXErr: Synthesizing Clinically Meaningful Errors in Diagnostic Radiology Reports — Pranav Rajpurkar, J. Acosta, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS