PGxQA: A Resource for Evaluating LLM Performance for Pharmacogenomic QA Tasks

Pharmacogenetics represents one of the most promising areas of precision medicine, with several guidelines for genetics-guided treatment ready for clinical use. Despite this, implementation has been slow, with few health systems incorporating the technology into their standard of care. One major barrier to uptake is the lack of education and awareness of pharmacogenetics among clinicians and patients. The introduction of large language models (LLMs) like GPT-4 has raised the possibility of medical chatbots that deliver timely information to clinicians, patients, and researchers with a simple interface. Although state-of-the-art LLMs have shown impressive performance at advanced tasks like medical licensing exams, in practice they still often provide false information, which is particularly hazardous in a clinical context. To quantify the extent of this issue, we developed a series of automated and expert-scored tests to evaluate the performance of chatbots in answering pharmacogenetics questions from the perspective of clinicians, patients, and researchers. We applied this benchmark to state-of-the-art LLMs and found that newer models like GPT-4o greatly outperform their predecessors, but still fall short of the standards required for clinical use. Our benchmark will be a valuable public resource for subsequent developments in this space as we work towards better clinical AI for pharmacogenetics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789819807024_0017
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Gene expression and cancer classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PGxQA: A Resource for Evaluating LLM Performance for Pharmacogenomic QA Tasks

Michelle Whirl‐Carrillo, Rasika Venkatesh, Sony Tuteja, Yidi Huang et al.
6 citations
Gene expression and cancer classification
1.40
article

PGxQA: A Resource for Evaluating LLM Performance for Pharmacogenomic QA Tasks

Michelle Whirl‐Carrillo, Rasika Venkatesh, Sony Tuteja, Yidi Huang, Karl Keat, Katrin Sangkuhl, Teri E. Klein, Marylyn DeRiggi Ritchie, Binglan Li, Dokyoon Kim, Li Gong, Rachit Kumar
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Pharmacogenetics represents one of the most promising areas of precision medicine, with several guidelines for genetics-guided treatment ready for clinical use. Despite this, implementation has been slow, with few health systems incorporating the technology into their standard of care. One major barrier to uptake is the lack of education and awareness of pharmacogenetics among clinicians and patients. The introduction of large language models (LLMs) like GPT-4 has raised the possibility of medical chatbots that deliver timely information to clinicians, patients, and researchers with a simple interface. Although state-of-the-art LLMs have shown impressive performance at advanced tasks like medical licensing exams, in practice they still often provide false information, which is particularly hazardous in a clinical context. To quantify the extent of this issue, we developed a series of automated and expert-scored tests to evaluate the performance of chatbots in answering pharmacogenetics questions from the perspective of clinicians, patients, and researchers. We applied this benchmark to state-of-the-art LLMs and found that newer models like GPT-4o greatly outperform their predecessors, but still fall short of the standards required for clinical use. Our benchmark will be a valuable public resource for subsequent developments in this space as we work towards better clinical AI for pharmacogenetics.

Vol. 30
University of Pennsylvania (US), Stanford University (US)
National Institutes of Health, National Human Genome Research Institute
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Gene expression and cancer classification
1.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.