Development of Self-Efficacy in Clinical Communication Skills in a Student-Run Free Clinic

Background: Student Run Free Clinics (SRFCs) provide early opportunities for health professions students to engage in clinical learning and develop professional skills. They also provide a supportive learning space for students to develop self-efficacy (SE). However, little is known regarding whether SRFCs provide opportunities for students to develop SE in clinical communication skills. Methods: A survey containing 24 items about SE in clinical communication on a 10-point attitude scale and 4 open-ended items was distributed to all students at a health professions university. A Mann-Whitney test was used to compare quantitative responses of participants who volunteered in an SRFC and those who did not. A thematic qualitative analysis was conducted on the open-ended responses. Finally, the qualitative and quantitative analysis was considered together to better understand the development of SE in an SRFC. Results: A total of 27 students across 6 professional programs participated in the survey. There was no significant difference in SE of communication skills between SRFC student volunteers and non-SRFC students (U=77.5, p=0.71). In the qualitative analysis, SRFC student volunteers seemed to differentiate the SRFC from other clinical experiences while non-SRFC students anticipated that SRFC service could lead to more clinical practice in a safe learning environment. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that SE in clinical communication skills of SRFC student volunteers may not differ from non-SRFC students. However, the perceived benefits from participating and learning in a SRFC was found to have a positive impact. SRFCs may provide a special and safe space for student learning while also providing opportunities to practice clinical communication. Additionally, explicit focus on developing clinical communication skills in SRFCs may further help students with developing SE.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Student-Run Clinics
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59586/jsrc.v10i1.488
Primary Topic
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of Self-Efficacy in Clinical Communication Skills in a Student-Run Free Clinic

Joseph C. Rumenapp, Melissa Chen, Emily Floramo, Izhani Rosa et al.
Journal of Student-Run Clinics
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
article

Development of Self-Efficacy in Clinical Communication Skills in a Student-Run Free Clinic

Joseph C. Rumenapp, Melissa Chen, Emily Floramo, Izhani Rosa, Meredith Baker-Rush
article en

Abstract

Background: Student Run Free Clinics (SRFCs) provide early opportunities for health professions students to engage in clinical learning and develop professional skills. They also provide a supportive learning space for students to develop self-efficacy (SE). However, little is known regarding whether SRFCs provide opportunities for students to develop SE in clinical communication skills. Methods: A survey containing 24 items about SE in clinical communication on a 10-point attitude scale and 4 open-ended items was distributed to all students at a health professions university. A Mann-Whitney test was used to compare quantitative responses of participants who volunteered in an SRFC and those who did not. A thematic qualitative analysis was conducted on the open-ended responses. Finally, the qualitative and quantitative analysis was considered together to better understand the development of SE in an SRFC. Results: A total of 27 students across 6 professional programs participated in the survey. There was no significant difference in SE of communication skills between SRFC student volunteers and non-SRFC students (U=77.5, p=0.71). In the qualitative analysis, SRFC student volunteers seemed to differentiate the SRFC from other clinical experiences while non-SRFC students anticipated that SRFC service could lead to more clinical practice in a safe learning environment. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that SE in clinical communication skills of SRFC student volunteers may not differ from non-SRFC students. However, the perceived benefits from participating and learning in a SRFC was found to have a positive impact. SRFCs may provide a special and safe space for student learning while also providing opportunities to practice clinical communication. Additionally, explicit focus on developing clinical communication skills in SRFCs may further help students with developing SE.

Journal of Student-Run ClinicsVol. 10(1)
Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science (US), Franklin University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.