Making a Difference in the Workplace: A Systematic Literature Review of Prosocial Impact

Prosociality at work has attracted academic interest for decades. Particularly, the concept of prosocial impact— the subjective experience of making a positive difference for others through one’s work—calls for more research. Our systematic review of literature from 2018 to 2023 examined: (1) How has prosocial impact been defined in prior research? (2) Which theories underpin the research? (3) In what organizational contexts has prosocial impact been studied, and with what specific samples/populations?, and (4) How has the variable of prosocial impact been used in quantitative studies, mixed methods research, and as a concept in qualitative research? Thirty-six empirical articles met our inclusion criteria. The findings consolidate knowledge on prosocial impact and highlight its relevance in organizational studies, providing insights for both practitioners and researchers. Moreover, the review outlines a research agenda to further explore prosocial impact within human resource development, emphasizing its growing significance in understanding organizational behavior.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Resource Development Review
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843241301652
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Behavioral Health and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Making a Difference in the Workplace: A Systematic Literature Review of Prosocial Impact

Andrea D. Ellinger, Denise M. Cumberland, Brianna S. Roberts
4 citations
Human Resource Development Review
Behavioral Health and Interventions
1.64
article

Making a Difference in the Workplace: A Systematic Literature Review of Prosocial Impact

Andrea D. Ellinger, Denise M. Cumberland, Brianna S. Roberts
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Prosociality at work has attracted academic interest for decades. Particularly, the concept of prosocial impact— the subjective experience of making a positive difference for others through one’s work—calls for more research. Our systematic review of literature from 2018 to 2023 examined: (1) How has prosocial impact been defined in prior research? (2) Which theories underpin the research? (3) In what organizational contexts has prosocial impact been studied, and with what specific samples/populations?, and (4) How has the variable of prosocial impact been used in quantitative studies, mixed methods research, and as a concept in qualitative research? Thirty-six empirical articles met our inclusion criteria. The findings consolidate knowledge on prosocial impact and highlight its relevance in organizational studies, providing insights for both practitioners and researchers. Moreover, the review outlines a research agenda to further explore prosocial impact within human resource development, emphasizing its growing significance in understanding organizational behavior.

Human Resource Development ReviewVol. 24(2)
University of Louisville (US), The University of Texas at Tyler (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Behavioral Health and Interventions
1.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.