Research on College Writing Feedback Method Based on Metacognition

This study focused on a writing environment in which it is difficult to establish oneself in the infinite information generated by machines, and people are fascinated by writing that produces results relying on the convenience of artificial intelligence. As a result of operating feedback based on “metacognition” as an educational response plan, the following educational meaning was derived: Self-feedback via self-evaluation activates metacognitive strategies for monitoring and self-regulation. Peer feedback reinforces self-objectification in the process of reviewing others’ writings. Instructors can use self-feedback and peer feedback to improve learners’ writing efficacy and encourage their participation in subsequent classes. Ultimately, a multilayered cascade of feedback that combines peer and instructor feedback with self-feedback is meaningful in that it creates conditions in which learners lead metacognition. Despite some limitations, we expect that the discussion in this paper will be shared as an example of a teaching-learning method in educational settings that recognizes the close relationship between college writing and metacognition.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37736/kjlr.2024.10.15.5.09
Primary Topic
Reflective Practices in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on College Writing Feedback Method Based on Metacognition

Yang-hyeon Kwon
Reflective Practices in Education
article

Research on College Writing Feedback Method Based on Metacognition

Yang-hyeon Kwon
article en

Abstract

This study focused on a writing environment in which it is difficult to establish oneself in the infinite information generated by machines, and people are fascinated by writing that produces results relying on the convenience of artificial intelligence. As a result of operating feedback based on “metacognition” as an educational response plan, the following educational meaning was derived: Self-feedback via self-evaluation activates metacognitive strategies for monitoring and self-regulation. Peer feedback reinforces self-objectification in the process of reviewing others’ writings. Instructors can use self-feedback and peer feedback to improve learners’ writing efficacy and encourage their participation in subsequent classes. Ultimately, a multilayered cascade of feedback that combines peer and instructor feedback with self-feedback is meaningful in that it creates conditions in which learners lead metacognition. Despite some limitations, we expect that the discussion in this paper will be shared as an example of a teaching-learning method in educational settings that recognizes the close relationship between college writing and metacognition.

Vol. 15(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Reflective Practices in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.