Generative AI-based Writing Feedback Model Development

This study aimed to develop a systematic writing feedback model that reduces the burden on teachers in the writing process while allowing students to receive individualized feedback using generative AI. Thirteen experts were recruited and a Delphi survey was conducted. The results were as follows. First, we identified a writing process for utilizing generative AI and a feedback structure for that process. Second, we finalized the argumentative writing test and its evaluation factors and detailed scoring criteria to be applied to this model. Third, we added examples of generative AI question types and prompts to provide concrete examples of the model. The implications are as follows. First, generative AI has the potential to drive self-reflective feedback from students during the writing process. Second, generative AI can reduce teacher fatigue and provide more personalized feedback. Finally, we propose a concrete feedback model for generative AI in education. However, this study had a limitation in that it did not confirm the effect through the application of a practical model. Therefore, we will continue to conduct follow-up research.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37736/kjlr.2024.10.15.5.01
Primary Topic
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generative AI-based Writing Feedback Model Development

Jin‐Young Choi
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
article

Generative AI-based Writing Feedback Model Development

Jin‐Young Choi
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to develop a systematic writing feedback model that reduces the burden on teachers in the writing process while allowing students to receive individualized feedback using generative AI. Thirteen experts were recruited and a Delphi survey was conducted. The results were as follows. First, we identified a writing process for utilizing generative AI and a feedback structure for that process. Second, we finalized the argumentative writing test and its evaluation factors and detailed scoring criteria to be applied to this model. Third, we added examples of generative AI question types and prompts to provide concrete examples of the model. The implications are as follows. First, generative AI has the potential to drive self-reflective feedback from students during the writing process. Second, generative AI can reduce teacher fatigue and provide more personalized feedback. Finally, we propose a concrete feedback model for generative AI in education. However, this study had a limitation in that it did not confirm the effect through the application of a practical model. Therefore, we will continue to conduct follow-up research.

Vol. 15(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Generative AI-based Writing Feedback Model Development — Jin‐Young Choi · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS