What Would Have Helped People With Profound Intellectual and Multiple Disabilities in the <scp>UK</scp> During <scp>COVID</scp>‐19?

People with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities can be excluded from research and relatively little is known about the experiences of people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities and their carers during COVID-19. This paper aims to further explore the impact on this group via information provided by paid and family carers. It focuses on key areas such as access to social and health services in addition to questions about health and well-being. In contextualising these results, some comparisons are made to impacts on other groups. This paper also explores what we might do better in future to support this population. Carers were invited to complete an online survey about their experiences and the experiences of people they supported during COVID-19 and to suggest what might have made life better. They were invited to complete this survey at four time points (waves) between December 2020 and December 2022. This paper reports on Waves 1-3, that is to August 2022. Services for people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities reduced during COVID-19 and have yet to return to pre-pandemic levels. People with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities were reported to experience increased social isolation, deteriorating mental and physical health, increased behavioural signs of distress and reduced life skills. Three areas were identified regarding what would have made life better: opportunities for social contact and activities; improved access to health and social care services, and; consistent and responsive staff. Results are explored in the context of current challenges in service provision, including staff retention and shifts in staff culture during the pandemic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.70000
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.58

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Would Have Helped People With Profound Intellectual and Multiple Disabilities in the UK During COVID‐19?

Edward Oloidi, Richard P. Hastings, Stuart Todd, Chris Hatton et al.
3 citations
Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities
Health disparities and outcomes
1.58
article

What Would Have Helped People With Profound Intellectual and Multiple Disabilities in the UK During COVID‐19?

Edward Oloidi, Richard P. Hastings, Stuart Todd, Chris Hatton, Andrew J. Jahoda, Sue Caton, Amanda Gillooly, Roseann Maguire, Laurence Taggart, Jill Bradshaw
article en
3 citations

Abstract

People with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities can be excluded from research and relatively little is known about the experiences of people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities and their carers during COVID-19. This paper aims to further explore the impact on this group via information provided by paid and family carers. It focuses on key areas such as access to social and health services in addition to questions about health and well-being. In contextualising these results, some comparisons are made to impacts on other groups. This paper also explores what we might do better in future to support this population. Carers were invited to complete an online survey about their experiences and the experiences of people they supported during COVID-19 and to suggest what might have made life better. They were invited to complete this survey at four time points (waves) between December 2020 and December 2022. This paper reports on Waves 1-3, that is to August 2022. Services for people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities reduced during COVID-19 and have yet to return to pre-pandemic levels. People with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities were reported to experience increased social isolation, deteriorating mental and physical health, increased behavioural signs of distress and reduced life skills. Three areas were identified regarding what would have made life better: opportunities for social contact and activities; improved access to health and social care services, and; consistent and responsive staff. Results are explored in the context of current challenges in service provision, including staff retention and shifts in staff culture during the pandemic.

Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual DisabilitiesVol. 21(4)
Manchester Metropolitan University (GB), University of South Wales (GB), University of Ulster (GB), University of Kent (GB), University of Warwick (GB), University of Glasgow (GB)
UK Research and Innovation, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Medical Research Council
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Health disparities and outcomes
1.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.