Holding a Brave Space: Lessons from Reality Storytelling

Brave spaces can be understood to be anything from everyday life to spaces with ground rules and an agreement to have challenging conversations. Brave spaces are sometimes assumed to be at odds with free speech. However, since hate speech discourages the speech of those targeted, brave spaces may provide more freedom of speech overall. Reality storytelling shows, in which ordinary people share personal stories, often offer an intentionally or unintentionally brave space and encourage mostly uncensored speech. For this study, the author attended reality storytelling shows across the United States and interviewed participants of these shows, seeking to answer the question: How do reality storytelling shows establish and hold a brave space? Interview transcripts, field notes, and documents were analyzed through qualitative coding, and memos were made available to the public through a blog. Some shows state ground rules along the lines of “no hate speech” for storytellers and audience members and express a willingness to remove offenders. Even shows with no rules do not tolerate hate speech when it happens. In practice, those who transgress are not always removed. Unintentional offenders may be “called in.” Although educational, the process remains uncomfortable. Lessons from reality storytelling that may translate into other areas include these actions: leaders must be willing to take action to hold the space, the community should be explicit about consequences for transgressing norms, and all participants should truly understand how they might be called upon to be brave.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Information Diversity & Inclusion (IJIDI)
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33137/ijidi.v8i3/4.43657
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Digital Storytelling and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.75

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Holding a Brave Space: Lessons from Reality Storytelling

Sarah Beth Nelson
2 citations
The International Journal of Information Diversity & Inclusion (IJIDI)
Digital Storytelling and Education
1.75
article

Holding a Brave Space: Lessons from Reality Storytelling

Sarah Beth Nelson
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Brave spaces can be understood to be anything from everyday life to spaces with ground rules and an agreement to have challenging conversations. Brave spaces are sometimes assumed to be at odds with free speech. However, since hate speech discourages the speech of those targeted, brave spaces may provide more freedom of speech overall. Reality storytelling shows, in which ordinary people share personal stories, often offer an intentionally or unintentionally brave space and encourage mostly uncensored speech. For this study, the author attended reality storytelling shows across the United States and interviewed participants of these shows, seeking to answer the question: How do reality storytelling shows establish and hold a brave space? Interview transcripts, field notes, and documents were analyzed through qualitative coding, and memos were made available to the public through a blog. Some shows state ground rules along the lines of “no hate speech” for storytellers and audience members and express a willingness to remove offenders. Even shows with no rules do not tolerate hate speech when it happens. In practice, those who transgress are not always removed. Unintentional offenders may be “called in.” Although educational, the process remains uncomfortable. Lessons from reality storytelling that may translate into other areas include these actions: leaders must be willing to take action to hold the space, the community should be explicit about consequences for transgressing norms, and all participants should truly understand how they might be called upon to be brave.

The International Journal of Information Diversity & Inclusion (IJIDI)
University of Wisconsin–Whitewater (US)
University of Toronto
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Digital Storytelling and Education
1.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.