Dialysis Practices Across India - A Nationwide Study

Background The practise of hemodialysis (HD) is highly variable in terms of geographical distribution, medical enterprises, human resources allocation, financial support, and type of population. This study aims to examine the dialysis practices across participating centers in an incident end-stage kidney disease study in India. Materials and Methods Thirty dialysis centers across West, Central, and Southern India were enrolled in April 2019 as part of a point prevalence cross-sectional multicentric descriptive study to examine dialysis practice patterns. Only centers providing more than 500 dialyses per month and a minimum of 10 machines were included. Data were collected using electronic forms. Results The distribution of dialysis centers as per ownership was divided into government, private, and public–private partnership (PPP) models, with 4 (13.33%), 7 (23.33%), and 19 (63.33%) each, respectively. The majority (36.67%) of the dialysis centers housed 11–20 dialysis stations. Two (6.67%) of the centers were of large volume, catering > 40 dialysis stations. Around 90% of the dialyzers were reused 4–6 times before discarding. Most centers (50%) performed less than 1000 dialysis per month. All centers had water treatment plants with deionizer and used carbon filters and reverse osmosis technology. Around 93% of the centers used UV light for disinfection. 56.6% of the plants used nonstandardized analysis for chemical assessment of the quality of treated water, while 66.67% utilized culture and sensitivity for microbiological assessment of treated water quality. Patient segregation policy was followed in 93% of the centers, and all centers had qualified nephrologist coverage. Conclusion Indian hemodialysis centers are mostly stand-alone and cater to a low to medium volume of end-stage renal disease patients. There has been a shift from privately run dialysis units in the past to the PPP model of dialysis delivery. Most dialysis centers have a quality control mechanism in place.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Journal of Nephrology
Published
2024-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25259/ijn_410_2024
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Healthcare Systems and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.08
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dialysis Practices Across India - A Nationwide Study

Nagesh Aghor, Maulik Shah, Kalpesh Gohel, PS Priyamvada et al.
2 citations
Indian Journal of Nephrology
Healthcare Systems and Reforms
1.08
article

Dialysis Practices Across India - A Nationwide Study

Nagesh Aghor, Maulik Shah, Kalpesh Gohel, PS Priyamvada, Manish Dabhi, Mallikarjun Karishetti, Vipul Chakurkar, Urmila Anandh, Nitiraj Shete, Anil Kumar Patel, Umesh Khanna, Dhananjay S. Ookalkar, V. Narayanan Unni, Neel Patel, B. P. Kalani, Sree Bhushan Raju, Abhijit Konnur, Maulin Shah, Natarajan Gopalakrishnan, Ashaka Patel, Siddharth Mavani, Santosh Durugkar, Manisha Sahay, Jigar Srimali, Kailash Shewale, Siddhesh Vishwas Dhaygude
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Background The practise of hemodialysis (HD) is highly variable in terms of geographical distribution, medical enterprises, human resources allocation, financial support, and type of population. This study aims to examine the dialysis practices across participating centers in an incident end-stage kidney disease study in India. Materials and Methods Thirty dialysis centers across West, Central, and Southern India were enrolled in April 2019 as part of a point prevalence cross-sectional multicentric descriptive study to examine dialysis practice patterns. Only centers providing more than 500 dialyses per month and a minimum of 10 machines were included. Data were collected using electronic forms. Results The distribution of dialysis centers as per ownership was divided into government, private, and public–private partnership (PPP) models, with 4 (13.33%), 7 (23.33%), and 19 (63.33%) each, respectively. The majority (36.67%) of the dialysis centers housed 11–20 dialysis stations. Two (6.67%) of the centers were of large volume, catering > 40 dialysis stations. Around 90% of the dialyzers were reused 4–6 times before discarding. Most centers (50%) performed less than 1000 dialysis per month. All centers had water treatment plants with deionizer and used carbon filters and reverse osmosis technology. Around 93% of the centers used UV light for disinfection. 56.6% of the plants used nonstandardized analysis for chemical assessment of the quality of treated water, while 66.67% utilized culture and sensitivity for microbiological assessment of treated water quality. Patient segregation policy was followed in 93% of the centers, and all centers had qualified nephrologist coverage. Conclusion Indian hemodialysis centers are mostly stand-alone and cater to a low to medium volume of end-stage renal disease patients. There has been a shift from privately run dialysis units in the past to the PPP model of dialysis delivery. Most dialysis centers have a quality control mechanism in place.

Indian Journal of NephrologyVol. 36
Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre (IN), Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences (IN), Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital (IN), Ashwini Hospital (IN), Shree Krishna Hospital (IN), Gujarat Kidney Foundation (IN), KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research (IN), College of Medicine & JNM Hospital (IN), Zydus Lifesciences Limited (India) (IN), Aster Medcity (IN), Bhaikaka University, Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research (IN), Osmania Medical College (IN)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Healthcare Systems and Reforms
1.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.