Two-Stage EDAS Decision Approach with Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Information

This paper develops a two-stage decision approach with probabilistic hesitant fuzzy data. Research challenges in earlier models are: (i) the calculation of occurrence probability; (ii) imputation of missing elements; (iii) consideration of attitude and hesitation of experts during weight calculation; (iv) capturing of interdependencies among experts during aggregation; and (v) ranking of alternatives with resemblance to human cognition. Driven by these challenges, a new group decision-making model is proposed with integrate methods for data curation and decision-making. The usefulness and superiority of the model is realized via an illustrative example of a logistic service provider selection.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Informatica
Published
2024-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15388/24-infor577
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Two-Stage EDAS Decision Approach with Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Information

Raghunathan Krishankumar, Amir H. Gandomi, Pratibha Rani, Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas et al.
1 citations
Informatica
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
0.49
article

Two-Stage EDAS Decision Approach with Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Information

Raghunathan Krishankumar, Amir H. Gandomi, Pratibha Rani, Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas, K. S. Ravichandran, Arunodaya Raj Mishra, Fatih Ecer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper develops a two-stage decision approach with probabilistic hesitant fuzzy data. Research challenges in earlier models are: (i) the calculation of occurrence probability; (ii) imputation of missing elements; (iii) consideration of attitude and hesitation of experts during weight calculation; (iv) capturing of interdependencies among experts during aggregation; and (v) ranking of alternatives with resemblance to human cognition. Driven by these challenges, a new group decision-making model is proposed with integrate methods for data curation and decision-making. The usefulness and superiority of the model is realized via an illustrative example of a logistic service provider selection.

Informatica
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
0.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.