How Do the Velocity Anisotropies of Halo Stars, Dark Matter, and Satellite Galaxies Depend on Host Halo Properties?

Abstract We investigate the mass ( M 200 ) and concentration ( c 200 ) dependencies of the velocity anisotropy ( β ) profiles for different components in the dark matter halo—including halo stars, dark matter, and subhalos—using systems from the IllustrisTNG simulations. Beyond a critical radius, β becomes more radial with the increase of M 200 , reflecting more prominent radial accretion around massive halos. The critical radius is r ∼ r s , 0.3 r s , and r s for halo stars, dark matter, and subhalos, with r s being the scale radius of the host halos. This dependence on M 200 is the strongest for subhalos and the weakest for halo stars. In central regions, the β of halo stars and dark matter particles get more isotropic with the increase of M 200 in TNG300 due to baryons. By contrast, the β of dark matter from the dark-matter-only TNG300-Dark run shows much weaker dependence on M 200 within r s . Dark matter in TNG300 is slightly more isotropic than in TNG300-Dark at 0.2 r s &lt; r &lt; 10 r s and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>log</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="italic">M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>200</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo stretchy="true">/</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="italic">M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>⊙</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo> <mml:mn>13.8</mml:mn> </mml:math> . Halo stars and dark matter also become more radial with the increase in c 200 , at fixed M 200 . Halo stars are more radial than the β profile of dark matter by approximately a constant beyond r s . Dark matter particles are more radial than subhalos. The differences can be understood, as subhalos on more radial orbits are more easily stripped, contributing more stars and dark matter to the diffuse components. We provide the fitting formula for the differences between the β of halo stars and dark matter at r s &lt; r &lt; 3 r s as <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>β</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>star</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>β</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>DM</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.034</mml:mn> <mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.012</mml:mn> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>log</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="italic">M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>200</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo stretchy="true">/</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="italic">M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>⊙</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mspace width="0.25em"/> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.772</mml:mn> <mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.163</mml:mn> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:math> for <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>log</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="italic">M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>200</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo stretchy="true">/</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="italic">M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>⊙</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>≥</mml:mo> <mml:mn>13</mml:mn> </mml:math> and as β star − β DM = 0.328 for <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>log</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2024-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad8882
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.65

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Do the Velocity Anisotropies of Halo Stars, Dark Matter, and Satellite Galaxies Depend on Host Halo Properties?

Wenting Wang, Rui Shi, Jiaxin Han, Jiaxin He et al.
11 citations
The Astrophysical Journal
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
3.65
article

How Do the Velocity Anisotropies of Halo Stars, Dark Matter, and Satellite Galaxies Depend on Host Halo Properties?

Wenting Wang, Rui Shi, Jiaxin Han, Jiaxin He, Shi Shao, Zhaozhou Li, Vicente Rodríguez-Gómez, Yipeng Jing, X. T. Meng, Donghai Zhao, Zhenlin Tan
article en
11 citations

Abstract

Abstract We investigate the mass ( M 200 ) and concentration ( c 200 ) dependencies of the velocity anisotropy ( β ) profiles for different components in the dark matter halo—including halo stars, dark matter, and subhalos—using systems from the IllustrisTNG simulations. Beyond a critical radius, β becomes more radial with the increase of M 200 , reflecting more prominent radial accretion around massive halos. The critical radius is r ∼ r s , 0.3 r s , and r s for halo stars, dark matter, and subhalos, with r s being the scale radius of the host halos. This dependence on M 200 is the strongest for subhalos and the weakest for halo stars. In central regions, the β of halo stars and dark matter particles get more isotropic with the increase of M 200 in TNG300 due to baryons. By contrast, the β of dark matter from the dark-matter-only TNG300-Dark run shows much weaker dependence on M 200 within r s . Dark matter in TNG300 is slightly more isotropic than in TNG300-Dark at 0.2 r s &lt; r &lt; 10 r s and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>log</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="italic">M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>200</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo stretchy="true">/</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="italic">M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>⊙</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo> <mml:mn>13.8</mml:mn> </mml:math> . Halo stars and dark matter also become more radial with the increase in c 200 , at fixed M 200 . Halo stars are more radial than the β profile of dark matter by approximately a constant beyond r s . Dark matter particles are more radial than subhalos. The differences can be understood, as subhalos on more radial orbits are more easily stripped, contributing more stars and dark matter to the diffuse components. We provide the fitting formula for the differences between the β of halo stars and dark matter at r s &lt; r &lt; 3 r s as <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>β</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>star</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>β</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>DM</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.034</mml:mn> <mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.012</mml:mn> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>log</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="italic">M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>200</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo stretchy="true">/</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="italic">M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>⊙</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mspace width="0.25em"/> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.772</mml:mn> <mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.163</mml:mn> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:math> for <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>log</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="italic">M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>200</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo stretchy="true">/</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="italic">M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>⊙</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>≥</mml:mo> <mml:mn>13</mml:mn> </mml:math> and as β star − β DM = 0.328 for <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>log</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow>

The Astrophysical JournalVol. 976(2)
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Shanghai Astronomical Observatory (CN), National Astronomical Observatories (CN), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai, European Commission, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Higher Education Discipline Innovation Project
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
3.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.