Information avoidance: A critical conceptual review. An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper

Abstract Information avoidance has long been in the shadow of information seeking. Variously seen as undesired, maladaptive, or even pathological, information avoidance has lacked the sustained attention and conceptualization that has been provided to other information practices. It is also, perhaps uniquely among information practices, often invoked to blame or censure those who engage in it. However, closer examination of information avoidance reveals nuanced and complex patterns of interactions with information, ones that often have positive and beneficial outcomes. We challenge the simplistic tenor of this conversation through this critical conceptual review of information avoidance. Starting from an examination of how information avoidance has been treated within information science and related disciplines, we then draw upon the various terms that have been used to describe a lack of engagement with information to establish seven core characteristics of the concept. We subsequently use this analysis to establish our definition of information avoidance as practices that moderate interaction with information by reducing the intensity of information, restricting control over information, and/or excluding information based on perceived properties. We consider the implications of this definition and its view of information avoidance as a significant information practice on information research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24968
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.19
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Information avoidance: A critical conceptual review. An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper

Alison Hicks, Jenny Bronstein, Ian Ruthven, Gunilla Widén et al.
9 citations
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Misinformation and Its Impacts
10.19
article

Information avoidance: A critical conceptual review. An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper

Alison Hicks, Jenny Bronstein, Ian Ruthven, Gunilla Widén, Jette Seiden Hyldegård, Pamela J. McKenzie
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Abstract Information avoidance has long been in the shadow of information seeking. Variously seen as undesired, maladaptive, or even pathological, information avoidance has lacked the sustained attention and conceptualization that has been provided to other information practices. It is also, perhaps uniquely among information practices, often invoked to blame or censure those who engage in it. However, closer examination of information avoidance reveals nuanced and complex patterns of interactions with information, ones that often have positive and beneficial outcomes. We challenge the simplistic tenor of this conversation through this critical conceptual review of information avoidance. Starting from an examination of how information avoidance has been treated within information science and related disciplines, we then draw upon the various terms that have been used to describe a lack of engagement with information to establish seven core characteristics of the concept. We subsequently use this analysis to establish our definition of information avoidance as practices that moderate interaction with information by reducing the intensity of information, restricting control over information, and/or excluding information based on perceived properties. We consider the implications of this definition and its view of information avoidance as a significant information practice on information research.

Journal of the Association for Information Science and TechnologyVol. 76(1)
University of Copenhagen (DK), Western University (CA), Åbo Akademi University (FI), Bar-Ilan University (IL), University of Strathclyde (GB), University College London (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
10.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.