Racial and Gender Bias in School Psychologists’ Special Education Classification Considerations

For minoritized groups that disproportionately face insufficient access to clinical services, schools are often the most accessible means for formal evaluation and intervention for a range of disabilities. However, the long history of racial and gender disproportionality in special education necessitates a greater understanding of factors contributing to inaccurate identification. The current study employed a multilevel modeling framework to evaluate the influence of student race, ethnicity, and gender on 229 U.S. school psychologists’ initial special education eligibility considerations and associated confidence. The model revealed a significant four-way interaction between student race/ethnicity, student gender, participant confidence, and eligibility categories on participant likelihood ratings. These results may provide insight into the causes of the nationally documented identification disparities in schools and inform practices to reduce them. School psychologists should regularly reflect on their decision-making and work to reduce the effects of their potential biases in special education identification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remedial and Special Education
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325241297341
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Education Discipline and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Racial and Gender Bias in School Psychologists’ Special Education Classification Considerations

Bryn Harris, Jac’lyn Bera, Maryellen Brunson McClain, Megan E. Golson et al.
1 citations
Remedial and Special Education
Education Discipline and Inequality
2.10
article

Racial and Gender Bias in School Psychologists’ Special Education Classification Considerations

Bryn Harris, Jac’lyn Bera, Maryellen Brunson McClain, Megan E. Golson, Sarah Schwartz, Shayna Williams, Amanda L. Sullivan, Jiwon Kim
article en
1 citations

Abstract

For minoritized groups that disproportionately face insufficient access to clinical services, schools are often the most accessible means for formal evaluation and intervention for a range of disabilities. However, the long history of racial and gender disproportionality in special education necessitates a greater understanding of factors contributing to inaccurate identification. The current study employed a multilevel modeling framework to evaluate the influence of student race, ethnicity, and gender on 229 U.S. school psychologists’ initial special education eligibility considerations and associated confidence. The model revealed a significant four-way interaction between student race/ethnicity, student gender, participant confidence, and eligibility categories on participant likelihood ratings. These results may provide insight into the causes of the nationally documented identification disparities in schools and inform practices to reduce them. School psychologists should regularly reflect on their decision-making and work to reduce the effects of their potential biases in special education identification.

Remedial and Special EducationVol. 47(2)
Utah State University (US), University of Minnesota (US), Twin Cities Orthopedics (US), Indiana University Bloomington (US), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Education Discipline and Inequality
2.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.