Cardinality matching versus propensity score matching for addressing cluster-level residual confounding in implantable medical device and surgical epidemiology: a parametric and plasmode simulation study

CM offered better sample retention but higher bias in most scenarios compared to PSM. More research is needed to guide the use of CM particularly in constraint setting for confounders for medical device and surgical epidemiology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Published
2024-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-024-02406-z
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cardinality matching versus propensity score matching for addressing cluster-level residual confounding in implantable medical device and surgical epidemiology: a parametric and plasmode simulation study

Victoria Y. Strauss, Daniel Prieto‐Alhambra, Paul Coplan, Mike Du et al.
1 citations
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
0.71
article

Cardinality matching versus propensity score matching for addressing cluster-level residual confounding in implantable medical device and surgical epidemiology: a parametric and plasmode simulation study

Victoria Y. Strauss, Daniel Prieto‐Alhambra, Paul Coplan, Mike Du, Sara Khalid, Stephen S. Johnston
article en
1 citations

Abstract

CM offered better sample retention but higher bias in most scenarios compared to PSM. More research is needed to guide the use of CM particularly in constraint setting for confounders for medical device and surgical epidemiology.

BMC Medical Research MethodologyVol. 24(1)
Johnson & Johnson (United States) (US), Boehringer Ingelheim (Germany) (DE), Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre (GB), Erasmus MC (NL), University of Oxford (GB)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
0.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.