Cavities in Law Regarding Consumer Protection Due to Non-Similar Trademark Similarities

Consumer protection is an important aspect of intellectual property law, particularly in the context of non-similar trademark similarities. This study aims to identify legal gaps that arise due to the lack of clear regulations concerning trademarks that are not of the same type. In this research, the research method used is the statutory approach, also known as normative legal research. In the first subsection, various forms of legal gaps are outlined, including difficulties in determining the level of similarity between trademarks in different categories and the impact this has on consumers' rights to receive quality products. This study also discusses the consequences arising from these legal gaps, such as confusion among consumers and the potential for deception by irresponsible business actors. Additionally, the study suggests remedial measures, including the need for regulatory revisions and strengthening law enforcement, to ensure more effective protection for consumers. It is hoped that the results of this research can contribute to the development of better legal policies for consumer and trademark protection in Indonesia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Devotion Journal of Research and Community Service
Published
2024-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59188/devotion.v5i11.20686
Primary Topic
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cavities in Law Regarding Consumer Protection Due to Non-Similar Trademark Similarities

Hono Sejati, Naya Amin Zaini, Ida Apriyani
Devotion Journal of Research and Community Service
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
article

Cavities in Law Regarding Consumer Protection Due to Non-Similar Trademark Similarities

Hono Sejati, Naya Amin Zaini, Ida Apriyani
article en

Abstract

Consumer protection is an important aspect of intellectual property law, particularly in the context of non-similar trademark similarities. This study aims to identify legal gaps that arise due to the lack of clear regulations concerning trademarks that are not of the same type. In this research, the research method used is the statutory approach, also known as normative legal research. In the first subsection, various forms of legal gaps are outlined, including difficulties in determining the level of similarity between trademarks in different categories and the impact this has on consumers' rights to receive quality products. This study also discusses the consequences arising from these legal gaps, such as confusion among consumers and the potential for deception by irresponsible business actors. Additionally, the study suggests remedial measures, including the need for regulatory revisions and strengthening law enforcement, to ensure more effective protection for consumers. It is hoped that the results of this research can contribute to the development of better legal policies for consumer and trademark protection in Indonesia.

Devotion Journal of Research and Community ServiceVol. 5(11)
Universitas Darul Ulum (ID)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.