Development of Machine Learning Algorithms for Identifying Patients With Limited Health Literacy

Elastic-Net Penalized Logistic Regression had the best performance when compared with other ML algorithms with a c-statistic of 0.766, calibration slope/intercept of 1.044/-0.037, and a Brier score of 0.179. Over one-third of patients presenting to an outpatient spine center were found to have limited HL. While this algorithm is far from being used in clinical practice, ML algorithms offer a potential opportunity for identifying patients at risk for limited HL without administering in-person HL assessments. This could possibly enable screening and early intervention to mitigate the potential negative consequences of limited HL without taxing the existing clinical workflow.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Published
2024-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.14248
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of Machine Learning Algorithms for Identifying Patients With Limited Health Literacy

Jorrit‐Jan Verlaan, Dylan Koole, Oscar Shen, Tom M. de Groot et al.
3 citations
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
2.55
article

Development of Machine Learning Algorithms for Identifying Patients With Limited Health Literacy

Jorrit‐Jan Verlaan, Dylan Koole, Oscar Shen, Tom M. de Groot, Amanda Lans, Joseph H. Schwab
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Elastic-Net Penalized Logistic Regression had the best performance when compared with other ML algorithms with a c-statistic of 0.766, calibration slope/intercept of 1.044/-0.037, and a Brier score of 0.179. Over one-third of patients presenting to an outpatient spine center were found to have limited HL. While this algorithm is far from being used in clinical practice, ML algorithms offer a potential opportunity for identifying patients at risk for limited HL without administering in-person HL assessments. This could possibly enable screening and early intervention to mitigate the potential negative consequences of limited HL without taxing the existing clinical workflow.

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical PracticeVol. 31(1)
University Medical Center Groningen (NL), Harvard University (US), University of Groningen (NL), Utrecht University (NL), Leiden University Medical Center (NL), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
2.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.