A MELTING SNOWBALL—DIFFICULTIES IDENTIFYING PARTICULAR CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW

Abstract This article discusses the relationship between particular and general customary international law, grappling with academic views affirming that, ordinarily, the emergence of the former is a stage in the consolidation of the latter. It is argued that the higher standard of State consent required for the configuration of bilateral or regional custom suggests otherwise. In addition, it is also contended that a distinctive kind of opinio juris must be present for particular custom to arise: a conviction from the States concerned that their conduct is governed by particular (as opposed to general) customary law.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International and Comparative Law Quarterly
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020589324000320
Primary Topic
International Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A MELTING SNOWBALL—DIFFICULTIES IDENTIFYING PARTICULAR CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW

José Rogelio Gutiérrez Álvarez
International and Comparative Law Quarterly
International Law and Human Rights
article

A MELTING SNOWBALL—DIFFICULTIES IDENTIFYING PARTICULAR CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW

José Rogelio Gutiérrez Álvarez
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article discusses the relationship between particular and general customary international law, grappling with academic views affirming that, ordinarily, the emergence of the former is a stage in the consolidation of the latter. It is argued that the higher standard of State consent required for the configuration of bilateral or regional custom suggests otherwise. In addition, it is also contended that a distinctive kind of opinio juris must be present for particular custom to arise: a conviction from the States concerned that their conduct is governed by particular (as opposed to general) customary law.

International and Comparative Law QuarterlyVol. 73(4)
University of Cambridge (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
International Law and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.