ANTIMICROBIAL BIOACTIVE GLASS FOR TREATMENT OF TRAUMATIC OR PATHOLOGICAL BONE DEFECTS

Aim Biomaterial-associated infections (BAI) present a formidable clinical challenge. Bioactive glasses (BG) have proven highly successful in diverse clinical applications, especially in dentistry and orthopaedics. In this study, we aimed to determine the effect of three commonly used BG composition and particle sizes on cell and bacterial attachment and growth. Our focus is on understanding the changes in pH and osmotic pressure in the surrounding environment during glass degradation. Method First, three different melt-derived glasses were characterized by analyzing particle size and glass network structure using Raman and NMR. The different glasses were then tested in vitro by seeding 4x 10 4 cells/well (SaOS Cell line) in a 48 well plate. After a pre-incubation period of 72 hours, the different BGs and particle sizes were added to the cells and the pH value, ion release and live/dead staining was measured every hour. The effect of BG against bacteria ( S. epidermidis ) was analyzed after 24 and 72 hours of treatment by using XTT viability assay and CFU counting by plating out the treated aliquot agar to estimate the viable bacteria cells. Results All three BG compositions tested showed a significant increase in pH, which was highest in BG composition 45S5 with a value of 11 compared to the other BG compositions 10 and 9 in S53P4 and 13-93 respectively. This strong increase in the pH in all BG samples tested results in a strongly reduced cell viability rate of more than 75% compared to the untreated control and 6-fold reduction in bacterial viability compared to the untreated control. The live/ dead assay also showed an increased cell viability with increasing glass particle size (i. e smallest glass particle < 25% viable cell and largest glass particle> 65% viable cell). The ion release concentration over 50 h showed an increase in sodium ions to 0.25 mol/L, calcium to 0.003 mol/L and a decrease in phosphorus. Conclusions These results show that the composition of the bioactive glass and the choice of particle size have a major influence on subsequent applications. In addition to the different compositions of the BG, particle size and additional medium change also influence the pH and ion release, and therefore also on cells or bacteria viability. The sizes of the bioactive glass particle are inversely proportional to it. Further tests are necessary to develop custom design BG compositions, which simultaneously stimulate osteoblasts proliferation and prevent microbial adhesion.