IN VITRO STUDY ON CHEMICAL DEBRIDEMENT DURING PERIPROSTHETIC JOINT INFECTION SURGERY: WHAT IS THE BEST TREATMENT STRATEGY?

Aim Chemical debridement is a fundamental step during Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) surgery. Antiseptic solutions are commonly used, but evidence on the optimal antiseptic, concentration, and irrigation time is lacking. The aim of this study is to analyze and compare the anti-biofilm capacity of povidone iodine, H 2 0 2 , acetic acid and Bactisure™ after different exposure times, as well as their combinations. Method Surgical steel discs inoculated with methicillin susceptible (MSSA) and resistant S. aureus (MRSA), P. aeruginosa , and S. epidermidis were exposed to the following antiseptic solutions: 0.3% (PI0.3) and 10% povidone iodine (PI10), H 2 0 2 , 3% Acetic acid (AA3) and Bactisure™. Combinations included AA3, H 2 0 2 , and PI10 in various orders. Exposure time for the antiseptics solutions was 1, 3 and 5 minutes, while combinations had a 9-minute total exposure, 3 minutes per antiseptic sequentially. All experiments were performed in triplicate and with a sterile saline control. nThe reduction in colony-forming units (CFU) was measured after sonication, and biofilm structure was analyzed via scanning electron microscopy. Results PI showed the highest antibiofilm activity. PI0.3 eradicated bacteria on the discs after 3 and 5 minutes of exposure, but only achieved a 77.1% reduction after 1 minute. After PI10 treatment, we did not recover any bacteria regardless of exposure time. H 2 0 2 , AA3, and Bactisure™ reached a significantly lower bacterial decrease at all exposure times compared to PI0.3 and PI10. AA3 was less effective against MSSA and S. epidermidis . H 2 0 2 showed less activity against MRSA than PI0.3, PI10, and Bactisure™. Combinations of antiseptics starting with AA3 showed the best results in terms of CFU reduction and cell viability. Conclusions We propose a sequential combination of AA3 + H 2 0 2 + PI10 with an exposure time of 9 minutes for the chemical debridement in PJI surgery. First, AA3 performs debridement and disruption of the biofilm. Then, H 2 0 2 has a bactericidal effect and increases the porosity of the cell wall, and PI10 has a final bactericidal effect. If combinations are unavailable, PI is a cost-effective alternative.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Published
2024-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1302/1358-992x.2024.19.014
Primary Topic
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

IN VITRO STUDY ON CHEMICAL DEBRIDEMENT DURING PERIPROSTHETIC JOINT INFECTION SURGERY: WHAT IS THE BEST TREATMENT STRATEGY?

Pablo Sanz-Ruíz, Jose-Antonio Matas-Díaz, Marta Díaz-Navarro, María Guembe et al.
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
article

IN VITRO STUDY ON CHEMICAL DEBRIDEMENT DURING PERIPROSTHETIC JOINT INFECTION SURGERY: WHAT IS THE BEST TREATMENT STRATEGY?

Pablo Sanz-Ruíz, Jose-Antonio Matas-Díaz, Marta Díaz-Navarro, María Guembe, Miguel Márquez Gómez, Lourdes Prats Peinado
article en

Abstract

Aim Chemical debridement is a fundamental step during Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) surgery. Antiseptic solutions are commonly used, but evidence on the optimal antiseptic, concentration, and irrigation time is lacking. The aim of this study is to analyze and compare the anti-biofilm capacity of povidone iodine, H 2 0 2 , acetic acid and Bactisure™ after different exposure times, as well as their combinations. Method Surgical steel discs inoculated with methicillin susceptible (MSSA) and resistant S. aureus (MRSA), P. aeruginosa , and S. epidermidis were exposed to the following antiseptic solutions: 0.3% (PI0.3) and 10% povidone iodine (PI10), H 2 0 2 , 3% Acetic acid (AA3) and Bactisure™. Combinations included AA3, H 2 0 2 , and PI10 in various orders. Exposure time for the antiseptics solutions was 1, 3 and 5 minutes, while combinations had a 9-minute total exposure, 3 minutes per antiseptic sequentially. All experiments were performed in triplicate and with a sterile saline control. nThe reduction in colony-forming units (CFU) was measured after sonication, and biofilm structure was analyzed via scanning electron microscopy. Results PI showed the highest antibiofilm activity. PI0.3 eradicated bacteria on the discs after 3 and 5 minutes of exposure, but only achieved a 77.1% reduction after 1 minute. After PI10 treatment, we did not recover any bacteria regardless of exposure time. H 2 0 2 , AA3, and Bactisure™ reached a significantly lower bacterial decrease at all exposure times compared to PI0.3 and PI10. AA3 was less effective against MSSA and S. epidermidis . H 2 0 2 showed less activity against MRSA than PI0.3, PI10, and Bactisure™. Combinations of antiseptics starting with AA3 showed the best results in terms of CFU reduction and cell viability. Conclusions We propose a sequential combination of AA3 + H 2 0 2 + PI10 with an exposure time of 9 minutes for the chemical debridement in PJI surgery. First, AA3 performs debridement and disruption of the biofilm. Then, H 2 0 2 has a bactericidal effect and increases the porosity of the cell wall, and PI10 has a final bactericidal effect. If combinations are unavailable, PI is a cost-effective alternative.

Orthopaedic ProceedingsVol. 106-B(SUPP_19)
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.