Public perceptions and attitudes towards wages for essential frontline workers during the COVID-19 pandemic

Purpose How informed are people about the wage gap between those at the top and those at the lower end of the wage distribution? We analyse this question in the light of the debate that arose during the COVID-19 pandemic about the importance of essential frontline workers and how these are paid compared to other occupations. Design/methodology/approach The study uses wage data for managers in private and public enterprises in Norway in addition to data on wages for two groups of essential frontline workers: cleaning operatives and nurses. We compared this data with what a sample of Norwegians believe the different occupational groups earn and what they think they ideally should earn. Findings Respondents overestimate the wages of cleaners and nurses, and they think that both groups should be paid more than they actually earn. Respondents also report ideal wage gaps between managers and essential workers that are significantly smaller than the actual wage gap. Originality/value Previous research shows that people on average underestimate actual wage gaps in society and that most people want wage gaps that are far lower than these underestimates. This study adds to this literature by looking at what people know about the pay conditions of essential frontline workers and what they think essential frontline workers ideally should be paid compared to other types of work. Peer review The peer review history for this article is available at: https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/IJSE-03-2024-0222

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Social Economics
Published
2024-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijse-03-2024-0222
Primary Topic
Employment and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public perceptions and attitudes towards wages for essential frontline workers during the COVID-19 pandemic

Elin Svarstad, Jon Rei­er­sen
International Journal of Social Economics
Employment and Welfare Studies
article

Public perceptions and attitudes towards wages for essential frontline workers during the COVID-19 pandemic

Elin Svarstad, Jon Rei­er­sen
article en

Abstract

Purpose How informed are people about the wage gap between those at the top and those at the lower end of the wage distribution? We analyse this question in the light of the debate that arose during the COVID-19 pandemic about the importance of essential frontline workers and how these are paid compared to other occupations. Design/methodology/approach The study uses wage data for managers in private and public enterprises in Norway in addition to data on wages for two groups of essential frontline workers: cleaning operatives and nurses. We compared this data with what a sample of Norwegians believe the different occupational groups earn and what they think they ideally should earn. Findings Respondents overestimate the wages of cleaners and nurses, and they think that both groups should be paid more than they actually earn. Respondents also report ideal wage gaps between managers and essential workers that are significantly smaller than the actual wage gap. Originality/value Previous research shows that people on average underestimate actual wage gaps in society and that most people want wage gaps that are far lower than these underestimates. This study adds to this literature by looking at what people know about the pay conditions of essential frontline workers and what they think essential frontline workers ideally should be paid compared to other types of work. Peer review The peer review history for this article is available at: https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/IJSE-03-2024-0222

International Journal of Social Economics
University of South-Eastern Norway (NO), The Fafo Institute for Labour and Social Research, Vestfold University College (NO), Fafo Foundation (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Employment and Welfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.