PROPHYLAXIS OF PERIPROSTHETIC JOINT INFECTION IN MEGAPROSTHESIS: IS THE USE OF ANTIBIOTIC-LOADED CALCIUM SULPHATE BEADS BENEFICIAL?
Aim Megaprosthesis have become a standard option in limb preserving surgery after bone resection in musculoskeletal tumors. Recently they have also been used in complex revision arthroplasty in cases with massive bone loss. The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) both in primary oncology cases and aseptic revision cases and analyze which are the significant risk factors for PJI with a special interest on the use of prophylactic antibiotic loaded calcium sulfate beads Method All patients undergoing surgery with the use of megaprosthesis in our institution between January/2012 and December/2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Data was collected from electronic medical records. We identified 108 procedures involving megaprosthesis in 90 patients with an average follow-up of 37 months. Indications were 79 primary musculoskeletal tumors and 29 aseptic complex revision arthroplasty. Results Table 1 shows relevant clinical information. No significant risk factor was found either in uni or multivariate analysis. PJI rate was 15% (12/79) for primary musculoskeletal surgery and 31% (9/29) for complex revision surgery. The use of antibiotic loaded calcium sulfate beads did not show an advantage – 22% (9/41) with vs. 18% (12/67) without. Conclusions In this relatively small series it was not possible to show a significal association between PJI and certain known risk factors such as gender, ASA score, site of surgery (knee) and revision surgery. The use of antibiotic loaded calcium sulfate beads as prophylaxis was not beneficial in reducing PJI rates in our cohort. We acknowledge the limitations of our study: a small sample group, in a single institution with heterogeneity in terms of diagnosis and surgical site. We recognize the need for a multicentric study with a larger cohort to validate these findings. For any tables or figures, please contact the authors directly.
Authors
- Pedro Cardoso (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9825-6535)
- João Lucas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8164-370X)
- R. Mateus
- Miguel Rocha (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8439-8172)
- Ricardo Jorge Gomes de Sousa (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4293-7347)
- Diogo Nóbrega Catelas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0885-8947)
- João Nelas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2015-6972)
- Vânia C. C. Oliveira (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2695-4326)
- Guilherme Madeira
- Joana Contente
Institutions
- Instituto Politécnico de Leiria (PT)
- Hospital da Senhora da Oliveira Guimarães (PT)
- CUF Porto Hospital (PT)
- Instituto Politécnico de Santarém (PT)
- Hospital de Santo António (PT)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Orthopaedic Proceedings
- Published
- 2024-11-22
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1302/1358-992x.2024.19.063
- Primary Topic
- Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00