Production of prominence by Mandarin‑speaking EFL learners

Abstract This study investigated Mandarin-speaking English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) learners’ prominence production in relation to prominence position, focus type, and proficiency. Eighty Mandarin-speaking EFL learners and 20 native English speakers read 12 question-answer pairs in English, with the questions eliciting different prominence patterns (end vs. non-end) for different focus types (broad vs. narrow). The results revealed that the phonological aspect (prominence assignment) was influenced by prominence position, focus type, and proficiency, but the phonetic aspect (phonetic realization of prominence) was affected only by prominence position. Phonologically, the learners achieved more native-like performance on end than non-end prominence, on broad than narrow focus, and their performance improved with proficiency. Phonetically, they achieved more native-like performance on end than non-end prominence and produced native-like F 0 and intensity, but not duration. Drawing on these patterns, in teaching priorities should be given to prominence assignment over phonetic realization, non-end over end prominence, and narrow over broad focus.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Second Language Pronunciation
Published
2024-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.24010.hua
Primary Topic
Phonetics and Phonology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Production of prominence by Mandarin‑speaking EFL learners

Congchao Hua
Journal of Second Language Pronunciation
Phonetics and Phonology Research
article

Production of prominence by Mandarin‑speaking EFL learners

Congchao Hua
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study investigated Mandarin-speaking English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) learners’ prominence production in relation to prominence position, focus type, and proficiency. Eighty Mandarin-speaking EFL learners and 20 native English speakers read 12 question-answer pairs in English, with the questions eliciting different prominence patterns (end vs. non-end) for different focus types (broad vs. narrow). The results revealed that the phonological aspect (prominence assignment) was influenced by prominence position, focus type, and proficiency, but the phonetic aspect (phonetic realization of prominence) was affected only by prominence position. Phonologically, the learners achieved more native-like performance on end than non-end prominence, on broad than narrow focus, and their performance improved with proficiency. Phonetically, they achieved more native-like performance on end than non-end prominence and produced native-like F 0 and intensity, but not duration. Drawing on these patterns, in teaching priorities should be given to prominence assignment over phonetic realization, non-end over end prominence, and narrow over broad focus.

Journal of Second Language PronunciationVol. 11(1)
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US), City University of Macau (MO)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Phonetics and Phonology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Production of prominence by Mandarin‑speaking EFL learners — Congchao Hua · Journal of Second Language Pronunciation (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS