Green Versus Gray Initial Public Offerings: Ownership, Withdrawal, and Post-IPO Performance

Using a unique European dataset, we examine “green” (renewable energy) and “gray” (non-renewable energy) IPOs in terms of ownership characteristics, withdrawal probability, post-withdrawal survival, and post-IPO performance. We find greater private equity and venture capital involvement and higher levels of retained ownership for green IPOs. Gray firms prefer London’s AIM, known for lighter regulation. Green firms are less likely to withdraw in recent years, survive longer, and are less likely to be sold post-withdrawal. These results, indicating a positive market and “insider” sentiment toward green firms, suggest insiders of gray firms are more often motivated by “exit” desires. Initially, green IPOs underperform with more negative BHARs and lower alphas. However, over time, this underperformance decreases due to increased institutional ownership and a higher return “reward” for greater business risk. JEL Classification: G24, G34, Q56

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Energy Journal
Published
2024-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01956574241281585
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.16
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Green Versus Gray Initial Public Offerings: Ownership, Withdrawal, and Post-IPO Performance

Renzhu Zhang, Ivan Diaz‐Rainey, Pia Helbing, Freddie Cleverley
4 citations
The Energy Journal
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
2.16
article

Green Versus Gray Initial Public Offerings: Ownership, Withdrawal, and Post-IPO Performance

Renzhu Zhang, Ivan Diaz‐Rainey, Pia Helbing, Freddie Cleverley
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Using a unique European dataset, we examine “green” (renewable energy) and “gray” (non-renewable energy) IPOs in terms of ownership characteristics, withdrawal probability, post-withdrawal survival, and post-IPO performance. We find greater private equity and venture capital involvement and higher levels of retained ownership for green IPOs. Gray firms prefer London’s AIM, known for lighter regulation. Green firms are less likely to withdraw in recent years, survive longer, and are less likely to be sold post-withdrawal. These results, indicating a positive market and “insider” sentiment toward green firms, suggest insiders of gray firms are more often motivated by “exit” desires. Initially, green IPOs underperform with more negative BHARs and lower alphas. However, over time, this underperformance decreases due to increased institutional ownership and a higher return “reward” for greater business risk. JEL Classification: G24, G34, Q56

The Energy JournalVol. 46(2)
Griffith University (AU), Adam Smith Institute (GB), University of Glasgow (GB), University of Otago (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
2.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.