Marrying Top-k with Skyline Queries: Operators with Relaxed Preference Input and Controllable Output Size

The two paradigms to identify records of preference in a multi-objective setting rely either on dominance (e.g., the skyline operator) or on a utility function defined over the records’ attributes (typically using a top- k query). Despite their proliferation, each has its own palpable drawbacks. Motivated by these drawbacks, we identify three hard requirements for practical decision support, namely, personalization, controllable output size, and flexibility in preference specification. With these requirements as a guide, we combine elements from both paradigms and propose two new operators, ORD and ORU . We present a suite of algorithms for their efficient processing, dedicating more technical effort to ORU , whose nature is inherently more challenging. Specifically, besides a sophisticated algorithm for ORD , we describe two exact methods for ORU and one approximate. We perform a qualitative study to demonstrate how our operators work and evaluate the performance of our algorithms against adaptations of previous work that mimic their output.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM Transactions on Database Systems
Published
2024-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3705726
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Data Management and Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Marrying Top-k with Skyline Queries: Operators with Relaxed Preference Input and Controllable Output Size

K. Li, Kyriakos Mouratidis, Bo Tang
1 citations
ACM Transactions on Database Systems
Data Management and Algorithms
0.35
article

Marrying Top-k with Skyline Queries: Operators with Relaxed Preference Input and Controllable Output Size

K. Li, Kyriakos Mouratidis, Bo Tang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The two paradigms to identify records of preference in a multi-objective setting rely either on dominance (e.g., the skyline operator) or on a utility function defined over the records’ attributes (typically using a top- k query). Despite their proliferation, each has its own palpable drawbacks. Motivated by these drawbacks, we identify three hard requirements for practical decision support, namely, personalization, controllable output size, and flexibility in preference specification. With these requirements as a guide, we combine elements from both paradigms and propose two new operators, ORD and ORU . We present a suite of algorithms for their efficient processing, dedicating more technical effort to ORU , whose nature is inherently more challenging. Specifically, besides a sophisticated algorithm for ORD , we describe two exact methods for ORU and one approximate. We perform a qualitative study to demonstrate how our operators work and evaluate the performance of our algorithms against adaptations of previous work that mimic their output.

ACM Transactions on Database SystemsVol. 50(1)
University of California, Irvine (US), Southern University of Science and Technology (CN), Singapore Management University (SG)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Data Management and Algorithms
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.