Technical variability across the 450K, EPICv1, and EPICv2 DNA methylation arrays: lessons learned for clinical and longitudinal studies

DNA methylation (DNAm) is the most commonly measured epigenetic mechanism in human populations, with most studies using Illumina arrays to assess DNAm levels. In 2023, Illumina updated their DNAm arrays to the EPIC version 2 (EPICv2), building on prior iterations, namely the EPIC version 1 (EPICv1) and 450K arrays. Whether DNAm measurements are stable across these three generations of arrays has yet not been investigated, limiting the ability of researchers-especially those with longitudinal data-to compare and replicate results across arrays. Here, we present results from a study of 30 child participants (15 male; 15 female) from the Drakenstein Child Health Study, who had DNAm measured on all three of the latest arrays: 450K, EPICv1, and EPICv2. Using these data, we created an annotation of probe quality across arrays, which includes the intraclass correlations, interquartile ranges, correlations, and array bias (i.e., the extent to which DNAm levels were explained by array type) of all CpGs. We also present results from an analysis of sex differences, where we found that CpGs with lower replicability across arrays had higher array-based variance, suggesting this variance metric help guide replication efforts. We also showed that epigenetic age estimates across arrays were more stable when using the principal component versions of epigenetic clocks. Ultimately, this collection of results provides a framework for investigating the replicability and longitudinal stability of epigenetic changes across multiple versions of Illumina DNAm arrays.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Epigenetics
Published
2024-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-024-01761-4
Citations
18
Primary Topic
Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Technical variability across the 450K, EPICv1, and EPICv2 DNA methylation arrays: lessons learned for clinical and longitudinal studies

Erin C. Dunn, Nastassja Koen, Dan Joseph Stein, Alexandre A. Lussier et al.
18 citations
Clinical Epigenetics
Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
4.21
article

Technical variability across the 450K, EPICv1, and EPICv2 DNA methylation arrays: lessons learned for clinical and longitudinal studies

Erin C. Dunn, Nastassja Koen, Dan Joseph Stein, Alexandre A. Lussier, Isabel K. Schuurmans, Kristy Dever, Michael S. Kobor, Heather Joy Zar, Julie L. Maclsaac, Anna Großbach
article en
18 citations

Abstract

DNA methylation (DNAm) is the most commonly measured epigenetic mechanism in human populations, with most studies using Illumina arrays to assess DNAm levels. In 2023, Illumina updated their DNAm arrays to the EPIC version 2 (EPICv2), building on prior iterations, namely the EPIC version 1 (EPICv1) and 450K arrays. Whether DNAm measurements are stable across these three generations of arrays has yet not been investigated, limiting the ability of researchers-especially those with longitudinal data-to compare and replicate results across arrays. Here, we present results from a study of 30 child participants (15 male; 15 female) from the Drakenstein Child Health Study, who had DNAm measured on all three of the latest arrays: 450K, EPICv1, and EPICv2. Using these data, we created an annotation of probe quality across arrays, which includes the intraclass correlations, interquartile ranges, correlations, and array bias (i.e., the extent to which DNAm levels were explained by array type) of all CpGs. We also present results from an analysis of sex differences, where we found that CpGs with lower replicability across arrays had higher array-based variance, suggesting this variance metric help guide replication efforts. We also showed that epigenetic age estimates across arrays were more stable when using the principal component versions of epigenetic clocks. Ultimately, this collection of results provides a framework for investigating the replicability and longitudinal stability of epigenetic changes across multiple versions of Illumina DNAm arrays.

Clinical EpigeneticsVol. 16(1)
Broad Institute (US), South African Medical Research Council (ZA), Harvard University (US), University of British Columbia (CA), University of Cape Town (ZA), Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE), Purdue University West Lafayette (US), Erasmus MC (NL), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), NeuroDevelopment Center (US), BC Children's Hospital (CA), Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital (ZA)
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Wellcome Trust, National Institutes of Health, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Medical Research Council, National Institute of Mental Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
4.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.