‘A symbol with what architecture means as such and should accomplish’: On Aldo van Eyck’s concept of the ‘in-between’ and its connection with the dimension of Raumbildung

This article sheds new light on an essential component of Aldo van Eyck’s architectural theory: the concept of the ‘in-between’ and how this concept becomes manifest in and determines his architectural work. First, I argue that the concept of the in-between includes three complementary levels: two (socio-) spatial levels directly related to the dimension of Raumbildung [space formation] and one level tied to Van Eyck’s concept of ‘twin phenomena’. Second, this clarification leads to a new interpretation of Van Eyck’s architecture which focuses on the practical implementation of the in-between in connection with the particular kind of Raumbildung and demonstrates how his focus on the socio-spatial meaning of architecture and a formal-compositional way of designing are interconnected. Finally, the article aims to verify the fundamental significance that Van Eyck attributes to the in-between, concluding that this significance is intrinsically tied to the in-between’s immediate connection with the dimension of Raumbildung.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ARENA Journal of Architectural Research
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55588/ajar.395
Primary Topic
Art, Aesthetics, and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘A symbol with what architecture means as such and should accomplish’: On Aldo van Eyck’s concept of the ‘in-between’ and its connection with the dimension of Raumbildung

Oliver Sack
ARENA Journal of Architectural Research
Art, Aesthetics, and Perception
article

‘A symbol with what architecture means as such and should accomplish’: On Aldo van Eyck’s concept of the ‘in-between’ and its connection with the dimension of Raumbildung

Oliver Sack
article en

Abstract

This article sheds new light on an essential component of Aldo van Eyck’s architectural theory: the concept of the ‘in-between’ and how this concept becomes manifest in and determines his architectural work. First, I argue that the concept of the in-between includes three complementary levels: two (socio-) spatial levels directly related to the dimension of Raumbildung [space formation] and one level tied to Van Eyck’s concept of ‘twin phenomena’. Second, this clarification leads to a new interpretation of Van Eyck’s architecture which focuses on the practical implementation of the in-between in connection with the particular kind of Raumbildung and demonstrates how his focus on the socio-spatial meaning of architecture and a formal-compositional way of designing are interconnected. Finally, the article aims to verify the fundamental significance that Van Eyck attributes to the in-between, concluding that this significance is intrinsically tied to the in-between’s immediate connection with the dimension of Raumbildung.

ARENA Journal of Architectural ResearchVol. 9(1)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Art, Aesthetics, and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

‘A symbol with what architecture means as such and should accomplish’: On Aldo van Eyck’s concept of the ‘in-between’ and its connection with the dimension of Raumbildung — Oliver Sack · ARENA Journal of Architectural Research (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS