Promoting LC-QToF based non-targeted fingerprinting and biomarker selection with machine learning for the discrimination of black tea geographical origin
Traceability and mislabelling of black tea for their geographical origin is known as a major fraud concern of the sector. Discrimination among various geographical indications (GIs) can be challenging due to the complexity of chemical fingerprints in multi-class metabolomics analysis. In this study, 302 black tea samples from 9 main cultivation GI regions were collected. A comprehensive non-targeted fingerprinting workflow was built on liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-QToF), and a comparison between conventional chemometrics modelling and machine learning was performed. 229 and 145 metabolites were selected as biomarkers and the model robustness/performance were further validated through internal 7-fold cross-validation and external validation, showing 100 % accuracy for discriminating GI origin on both. This research provided a novel solution to enhance transparency and traceability in the black tea supply chain for lab scenarios. Furthermore, the proposed biomarker selection workflow revealed more insights for future machine learning-derived non-targeted metabolomics research.
Authors
- Christopher T. Elliott (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0495-2909)
- Yifeng Jiao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0653-6280)
- Y.F. Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6166-8595)
- Brian Quinn (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4182-1118)
- Yunhe Hong (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6454-1971)
- Di Wu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5895-2237)
- Nicholas Birse (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3867-3273)
- Natasha Logan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0420-5663)
Institutions
- Queen's University Belfast (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Food Chemistry
- Published
- 2024-11-23
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.142088
- Citations
- 12
- Primary Topic
- Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.81