Veterans’ Lung Cancer Risk Conceptualizations versus Lung Cancer Screening Shared Decision-Making Conversations with Clinicians: A Qualitative Study

Veterans' conceptualizations of their lung cancer risk were multifactorial and sometimes ranked exposure to occupational airborne hazards and family history above smoking in increasing lung cancer risk.However, patient-clinician lung cancer screening (LCS) conversations were typically brief and focused on smoking, which could stigmatize patients and failed to engage veterans in discussing what mattered most to them in thinking about their lung cancer risk.These findings are of heightened importance in light of the 2022 Sergeant First Class Heath Robinson Honoring our Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics (PACT) Act, which requires VA clinicians to discuss toxic military exposures and their relationship to lung cancer and other health conditions.Tools that help clinicians assess and incorporate multiple risk factors into discussions about lung cancer may better address patients' concerns and beliefs and lead to more engaging, less stigmatizing shared decision-making conversations about LCS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Decision Making
Published
2024-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x241292643
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Veterans’ Lung Cancer Risk Conceptualizations versus Lung Cancer Screening Shared Decision-Making Conversations with Clinicians: A Qualitative Study

Tanner J Caverly, L. Kearney, Christopher G. Slatore, Eduardo Núñez et al.
Medical Decision Making
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
article

Veterans’ Lung Cancer Risk Conceptualizations versus Lung Cancer Screening Shared Decision-Making Conversations with Clinicians: A Qualitative Study

Tanner J Caverly, L. Kearney, Christopher G. Slatore, Eduardo Núñez, Jacqueline Boudreau, Rendelle E. Bolton, Abigail N. Herbst, Renda Soylemez Wiener, Samantha K. Sliwinski
article en

Abstract

Veterans' conceptualizations of their lung cancer risk were multifactorial and sometimes ranked exposure to occupational airborne hazards and family history above smoking in increasing lung cancer risk.However, patient-clinician lung cancer screening (LCS) conversations were typically brief and focused on smoking, which could stigmatize patients and failed to engage veterans in discussing what mattered most to them in thinking about their lung cancer risk.These findings are of heightened importance in light of the 2022 Sergeant First Class Heath Robinson Honoring our Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics (PACT) Act, which requires VA clinicians to discuss toxic military exposures and their relationship to lung cancer and other health conditions.Tools that help clinicians assess and incorporate multiple risk factors into discussions about lung cancer may better address patients' concerns and beliefs and lead to more engaging, less stigmatizing shared decision-making conversations about LCS.

Medical Decision MakingVol. 45(1)
Boston University (US), University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US), University of Michigan (US), VA Boston Healthcare System (US), VA New England Healthcare System (US), VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System (US), Baystate Health (US), VA Portland Health Care System (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.