A US payer budget impact analysis of Flurpiridaz-PET-MPI compared to SPECT-MPI in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease

The available literature to source all parameters in the model was limited; therefore, assumptions and additional calculations were made based on published evidence to inform the model. A one-way sensitivity analysis was performed to confirm and address uncertainty in key parameters. This comprehensive analysis illustrates that the superior diagnostic performance of F<sup>18</sup>-PET-MPI may result in reduced adverse CO events and associated costs, increased appropriate identification and treatment of CAD, and a minimal increase in overall costs among general and difficult-to-image patient subgroups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Economics
Published
2024-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2024.2431413
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A US payer budget impact analysis of Flurpiridaz-PET-MPI compared to SPECT-MPI in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease

Alicyia Walczyk Mooradally, Arturo Cabra, Erika Szabó, Stacey Priest
3 citations
Journal of Medical Economics
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
3.39
article

A US payer budget impact analysis of Flurpiridaz-PET-MPI compared to SPECT-MPI in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease

Alicyia Walczyk Mooradally, Arturo Cabra, Erika Szabó, Stacey Priest
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The available literature to source all parameters in the model was limited; therefore, assumptions and additional calculations were made based on published evidence to inform the model. A one-way sensitivity analysis was performed to confirm and address uncertainty in key parameters. This comprehensive analysis illustrates that the superior diagnostic performance of F<sup>18</sup>-PET-MPI may result in reduced adverse CO events and associated costs, increased appropriate identification and treatment of CAD, and a minimal increase in overall costs among general and difficult-to-image patient subgroups.

Journal of Medical EconomicsVol. 27(1)
General Electric (Spain) (ES), EVERSANA (Canada) (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
3.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.