Constitutive Modelling Analysis and Hot Deformation Process of AISI 8822H Steel

This study used the Gleeble 3800 thermomechanical simulator to examine the hot deformation characteristics of AISI 8822H steel. The main goal was to understand the alloy's behaviour under various thermomechanical settings, emphasising temperature ranges between 1173 K and 1323 K and strain rates from 0.01 s<sup>-1</sup> to 10 s<sup>-1</sup>. This study aimed to enhance the alloy's manufacturing process by offering a thorough understanding of the material's response to these conditions. Four various constitutive models-Arrhenius-type, Johnson-Cook, modified Johnson-Cook, and Trimble-were used in a comprehensive technique to forecast flow stress values in order to meet the study's goals. The accuracy of each model in forecasting the behaviour of the material under the given circumstances was assessed. A thorough comparison investigation revealed that the Trimble model was the most accurate model allowing prediction of material behaviour, with the maximum correlation factor (R = 0.99) and at least average absolute relative error (1.7%). On the other hand, the Johnson-Cook model had the least correlation factor (R = 0.92) and the maximum average absolute relative error (32.2%), indicating that it was the least accurate because it could not account for all softening effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials
Published
2024-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17235713
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Metallurgy and Material Forming
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Constitutive Modelling Analysis and Hot Deformation Process of AISI 8822H Steel

Wojciech Borek, Saad Ebied, Khaled Elanany
2 citations
Materials
Metallurgy and Material Forming
0.54
article

Constitutive Modelling Analysis and Hot Deformation Process of AISI 8822H Steel

Wojciech Borek, Saad Ebied, Khaled Elanany
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study used the Gleeble 3800 thermomechanical simulator to examine the hot deformation characteristics of AISI 8822H steel. The main goal was to understand the alloy's behaviour under various thermomechanical settings, emphasising temperature ranges between 1173 K and 1323 K and strain rates from 0.01 s<sup>-1</sup> to 10 s<sup>-1</sup>. This study aimed to enhance the alloy's manufacturing process by offering a thorough understanding of the material's response to these conditions. Four various constitutive models-Arrhenius-type, Johnson-Cook, modified Johnson-Cook, and Trimble-were used in a comprehensive technique to forecast flow stress values in order to meet the study's goals. The accuracy of each model in forecasting the behaviour of the material under the given circumstances was assessed. A thorough comparison investigation revealed that the Trimble model was the most accurate model allowing prediction of material behaviour, with the maximum correlation factor (R = 0.99) and at least average absolute relative error (1.7%). On the other hand, the Johnson-Cook model had the least correlation factor (R = 0.92) and the maximum average absolute relative error (32.2%), indicating that it was the least accurate because it could not account for all softening effects.

MaterialsVol. 17(23)
Silesian University of Technology (PL), Tanta University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Metallurgy and Material Forming
0.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Constitutive Modelling Analysis and Hot Deformation Process of AISI 8822H Steel — Wojciech Borek, Saad Ebied, et al. · Materials (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS