The politics of missions: a gloomy perspective

Abstract This article discusses the so far understudied role of politics in the development of transformative innovation policies (TIPs) and mission-oriented innovation policies (MOIPs). The topic is explored through four dimensions foreshadowing critical bottlenecks and obstacles which are somewhat neglected by the current scholarly discussion around TIPs and MOIPs. The first dimension concerns the relationship to the historical time of different political visions, affecting their inclination towards the transformative ambition of TIPs and MOIPs. The second pertains to the exercise of power and its relation to TIPs and MOIPs’ emphasis on distributed agency and participation. The third addresses the capacity to deliver policy changes, a key precondition for TIPs and MOIPs. Finally, the fourth dimension relates to how political systems deal with diverse values and beliefs, essential for the experimental nature of TIPs and MOIPs. The article concludes that the current trend towards conservatism, centralization, and political polarization in many advanced economies challenges the effective adoption and deployment of TIPs and MOIPs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science and Public Policy
Published
2024-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scae068
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
62.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The politics of missions: a gloomy perspective

Francesco Molica
6 citations
Science and Public Policy
Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics
62.13
article

The politics of missions: a gloomy perspective

Francesco Molica
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Abstract This article discusses the so far understudied role of politics in the development of transformative innovation policies (TIPs) and mission-oriented innovation policies (MOIPs). The topic is explored through four dimensions foreshadowing critical bottlenecks and obstacles which are somewhat neglected by the current scholarly discussion around TIPs and MOIPs. The first dimension concerns the relationship to the historical time of different political visions, affecting their inclination towards the transformative ambition of TIPs and MOIPs. The second pertains to the exercise of power and its relation to TIPs and MOIPs’ emphasis on distributed agency and participation. The third addresses the capacity to deliver policy changes, a key precondition for TIPs and MOIPs. Finally, the fourth dimension relates to how political systems deal with diverse values and beliefs, essential for the experimental nature of TIPs and MOIPs. The article concludes that the current trend towards conservatism, centralization, and political polarization in many advanced economies challenges the effective adoption and deployment of TIPs and MOIPs.

Science and Public PolicyVol. 52(1)
European Commission (BE)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics
62.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The politics of missions: a gloomy perspective — Francesco Molica · Science and Public Policy (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS