Stress path dependence of time-lapse seismic effects in shales: experimental comparison at seismic and ultrasonic frequencies

SUMMARY Changes in pore pressure within geological reservoirs, due to, for example hydrocarbon production, CO2 and energy storage or wastewater disposal, may cause substantial stress changes in the overburden, altering propagation velocities of elastic waves. The corresponding time-shifts are detected and quantified using time-lapse (4-D) seismic analysis. To invert seismic time-shifts for changes in stress and strains, stress sensitivity of rocks is studied in laboratory experiments on core plugs. Such measurements are typically conducted at ultrasonic frequencies. However, previous studies indicate that the stress sensitivity of velocities at seismic frequencies could be higher than that at ultrasonic frequencies. Therefore, calibration based on laboratory ultrasonic data may lead to inaccurate prediction of stresses and strains when applied to 4-D seismic data. To study the influence of frequency on stress sensitivity of acoustic wave velocities, a series of laboratory experiments was performed on two overburden shales with different petrophysical properties. In a low-frequency apparatus—a triaxial pressure cell that combines measurements at low (seismic) and high (ultrasonic) frequencies—the shale samples underwent stress changes with different ratios of horizontal to vertical stress amplitudes to mimic stress variations across the overburden. High-frequency velocity changes were directly recorded, while low-frequency velocity changes were obtained indirectly from the elastic parameters measured at seismic frequency by applying a rock physics inversion using third-order elasticity model. The experiments were conducted at undrained conditions, a representative state for reservoir overburden composed of shales. The results suggest that the stress sensitivities and strain sensitivities (R-factor) of P-wave velocities could be two to four times greater at seismic frequencies than at ultrasonic frequencies. Furthermore, it was found that the previously reported linear relation between the stress sensitivity and stress-path parameter (horizontal/vertical stress change) at ultrasonic frequencies also holds for seismic frequencies. We discuss the theoretical background for frequency-dependent stress sensitivity of wave velocities that supports the experimental findings. The effect of frequency when using laboratory-based calibrations should be taken into account when inverting time-lapse seismic data for changes in stresses and strains.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Journal International
Published
2024-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggae290
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.53

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stress path dependence of time-lapse seismic effects in shales: experimental comparison at seismic and ultrasonic frequencies

R. M. Holt, Marcin Duda, Serhii Lozovyi, Andreas Bauer
1 citations
Geophysical Journal International
Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
0.53
article

Stress path dependence of time-lapse seismic effects in shales: experimental comparison at seismic and ultrasonic frequencies

R. M. Holt, Marcin Duda, Serhii Lozovyi, Andreas Bauer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

SUMMARY Changes in pore pressure within geological reservoirs, due to, for example hydrocarbon production, CO2 and energy storage or wastewater disposal, may cause substantial stress changes in the overburden, altering propagation velocities of elastic waves. The corresponding time-shifts are detected and quantified using time-lapse (4-D) seismic analysis. To invert seismic time-shifts for changes in stress and strains, stress sensitivity of rocks is studied in laboratory experiments on core plugs. Such measurements are typically conducted at ultrasonic frequencies. However, previous studies indicate that the stress sensitivity of velocities at seismic frequencies could be higher than that at ultrasonic frequencies. Therefore, calibration based on laboratory ultrasonic data may lead to inaccurate prediction of stresses and strains when applied to 4-D seismic data. To study the influence of frequency on stress sensitivity of acoustic wave velocities, a series of laboratory experiments was performed on two overburden shales with different petrophysical properties. In a low-frequency apparatus—a triaxial pressure cell that combines measurements at low (seismic) and high (ultrasonic) frequencies—the shale samples underwent stress changes with different ratios of horizontal to vertical stress amplitudes to mimic stress variations across the overburden. High-frequency velocity changes were directly recorded, while low-frequency velocity changes were obtained indirectly from the elastic parameters measured at seismic frequency by applying a rock physics inversion using third-order elasticity model. The experiments were conducted at undrained conditions, a representative state for reservoir overburden composed of shales. The results suggest that the stress sensitivities and strain sensitivities (R-factor) of P-wave velocities could be two to four times greater at seismic frequencies than at ultrasonic frequencies. Furthermore, it was found that the previously reported linear relation between the stress sensitivity and stress-path parameter (horizontal/vertical stress change) at ultrasonic frequencies also holds for seismic frequencies. We discuss the theoretical background for frequency-dependent stress sensitivity of wave velocities that supports the experimental findings. The effect of frequency when using laboratory-based calibrations should be taken into account when inverting time-lapse seismic data for changes in stresses and strains.

Geophysical Journal InternationalVol. 240(1)
SINTEF (NO), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), Aker BP (Norway) (NO), SINTEF Industry (NO)
Shell, Aker BP, Norges Forskningsråd
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
0.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.