Comparative evaluation of eravacycline susceptibility testing methods in 587 clinical carbapenem-resistant <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> isolates: broth microdilution, MIC test strip and disc diffusion
The MTS and DD methods demonstrated strong consistency with the BMD reference method, with CA, ME and VME rates meeting methodological evaluation criteria. Both MTS and DD methods are reliable alternatives for assessing the antibacterial activity of eravacycline in clinical microbiology laboratories.
Authors
- Xuan Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4311-8749)
- Shirong Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3509-8585)
- Ning Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9457-0722)
- Qihui Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8985-1906)
- Haoqin Jiang
- Yijing Lin
Institutions
- Fudan University (CN)
- Huashan Hospital (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
- Published
- 2024-11-21
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkae426
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.34