Comparison of surgical invasiveness and hidden blood loss between unilateral double portal endoscopic lumbar disc extraction and percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis
Compared to UBE, PEID shows superior results regarding surgical trauma, total blood loss, hidden blood loss (HBL), and postoperative hematocrit (Hct) reduction. Consequently, PEID is recommended as the treatment of choice for younger patients or those with compromised baseline perioperative conditions.Additionally, Hidden blood loss remains a critical factor, and surgical duration presents a shared risk in both procedures.
Authors
- Shihao Zhou (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8597-9403)
- Xiaowan Xu
- A Jiancuo
- Hongshun Zhao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0228-4839)
- Yanhui Hao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4616-0152)
- Zhihua Xu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3517-2393)
- Tao Guo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8556-7564)
- Zibiao Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0591-5328)
- Panpan Hu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4441-2763)
Institutions
- Qinghai University (CN)
- Qinghai Red Cross Hospital (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
- Published
- 2024-11-21
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05274-x
- Citations
- 11
- Primary Topic
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 4.67