Evidence and Computer Simulations in Public Health

Abstract In the last decades, the evidence-based approach has become dominant in the biomedical sciences. Its influence has extended from clinical practice to other areas such as drug regulation and public health. Nonetheless, given the limitations of the evidence-based framework, a more pluralist approach towards evidence has been demanded. In this sense, evidential pluralism holds that evidence of mechanisms should complement statistical evidence. This paper aims to explore and discuss the prospects of evidential pluralism in public health. First, we will analyse the evidential standards of the International Agency for Research on Cancer. Those standards are argued to be in line with the pluralist approach. Second, we will consider the main challenges for gathering evidence of mechanisms in public health. For that purpose, diverse types of evidence of mechanisms will be identified. And third, we will assess the role of agent-based models as mechanistic studies. Based on a case study, we will discuss whether agent-based models can provide evidence of mechanisms and mitigate the abovementioned challenges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Philosophy
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-024-09723-4
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Philosophy and History of Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.04

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evidence and Computer Simulations in Public Health

Saúl Pérez‐González, Valeriano Iranzo García
1 citations
Global Philosophy
Philosophy and History of Science
6.04
article

Evidence and Computer Simulations in Public Health

Saúl Pérez‐González, Valeriano Iranzo García
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract In the last decades, the evidence-based approach has become dominant in the biomedical sciences. Its influence has extended from clinical practice to other areas such as drug regulation and public health. Nonetheless, given the limitations of the evidence-based framework, a more pluralist approach towards evidence has been demanded. In this sense, evidential pluralism holds that evidence of mechanisms should complement statistical evidence. This paper aims to explore and discuss the prospects of evidential pluralism in public health. First, we will analyse the evidential standards of the International Agency for Research on Cancer. Those standards are argued to be in line with the pluralist approach. Second, we will consider the main challenges for gathering evidence of mechanisms in public health. For that purpose, diverse types of evidence of mechanisms will be identified. And third, we will assess the role of agent-based models as mechanistic studies. Based on a case study, we will discuss whether agent-based models can provide evidence of mechanisms and mitigate the abovementioned challenges.

Global PhilosophyVol. 34(1-6)
Universitat de València (ES)
Universidad de Sevilla, Akademie Věd České Republiky, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Philosophy and History of Science
6.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evidence and Computer Simulations in Public Health — Saúl Pérez‐González, Valeriano Iranzo García · Global Philosophy (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS