Towards Developing the Scientific Basis for New Testing Methodologies to Quantify and Compare Firebrand Generation from Building Components

Abstract Firebrands are a dangerous threat, leading to fire spread at distances far away from the original fire location. Testing methodologies are needed to be develop materials so that buildings produce less firebrands during actual fire events. Through dedicated experiments focused on understanding the complex process of firebrand generation from full-scale buildings and building components under wind, a reduced-scale test method capable of comparing firebrand generation from mock-up assemblies has been developed. Here, a new series of full-scale experiments under wind, focused on roof assemblies fitted with cedar roof coverings, was undertaken to determine if the reduced-scale experimental method could indeed predict the full-scale experimental observations. The reduced-scale experimental method correctly predicted that: fire retardant cedar shakes would produce the least number of firebrands, the overall range of firebrand sizes generated from all types of cedar coverings utilized, and that the firebrand coefficient, namely, firebrand density times average thickness of firebrands, $${(\rho }_{fb}\times {\delta }_{ave, fb} ={\alpha }_{fb}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>ρ</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>fb</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>δ</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>a</mml:mi> <mml:mi>v</mml:mi> <mml:mi>e</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi>f</mml:mi> <mml:mi>b</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>fb</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ) increased as the wind speed increased for cedar shingles. Cedar shakes resulted in a different trend in firebrand coefficient, which may be expected due to their more non-uniform shape prior to combustion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fire Technology
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-024-01661-2
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards Developing the Scientific Basis for New Testing Methodologies to Quantify and Compare Firebrand Generation from Building Components

Sayaka Suzuki, Samuel L. Manzello, Tomohiro Naruse
4 citations
Fire Technology
Fire effects on ecosystems
1.13
article

Towards Developing the Scientific Basis for New Testing Methodologies to Quantify and Compare Firebrand Generation from Building Components

Sayaka Suzuki, Samuel L. Manzello, Tomohiro Naruse
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Firebrands are a dangerous threat, leading to fire spread at distances far away from the original fire location. Testing methodologies are needed to be develop materials so that buildings produce less firebrands during actual fire events. Through dedicated experiments focused on understanding the complex process of firebrand generation from full-scale buildings and building components under wind, a reduced-scale test method capable of comparing firebrand generation from mock-up assemblies has been developed. Here, a new series of full-scale experiments under wind, focused on roof assemblies fitted with cedar roof coverings, was undertaken to determine if the reduced-scale experimental method could indeed predict the full-scale experimental observations. The reduced-scale experimental method correctly predicted that: fire retardant cedar shakes would produce the least number of firebrands, the overall range of firebrand sizes generated from all types of cedar coverings utilized, and that the firebrand coefficient, namely, firebrand density times average thickness of firebrands, $${(\rho }_{fb}\times {\delta }_{ave, fb} ={\alpha }_{fb}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>ρ</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>fb</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>δ</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>a</mml:mi> <mml:mi>v</mml:mi> <mml:mi>e</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi>f</mml:mi> <mml:mi>b</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>fb</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ) increased as the wind speed increased for cedar shingles. Cedar shakes resulted in a different trend in firebrand coefficient, which may be expected due to their more non-uniform shape prior to combustion.

Fire TechnologyVol. 61(4)
Tohoku University (JP), National Research Institute of Fire and Disaster (JP), Building Research Institute (JP)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Fire effects on ecosystems
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.